"No Politics Here": Age and Gender in Soap Opera "Cyberfandom"

By Scodari, Christine | Women's Studies in Communication, Fall 1998 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

"No Politics Here": Age and Gender in Soap Opera "Cyberfandom"

Scodari, Christine, Women's Studies in Communication

"Virtual" ethnographic investigation of soap opera "cyberfan" discussion groups refutes claims of resistive public space, finding that industry infiltration, "netiquette," and other factors construct these Internet forums as sites of "escape" rather than politics. Moreover, "polyvalent" readings tend to reproduce the demographics strategy of advertisers--a strategy which flatters young female audiences at the expense of their older counterparts.

Critical/cultural media scholars debate the extent to which audiences interpret and use hegemonic texts in resistive ways. Political economists examine the issue macroscopically, arguing that the structures, processes, and commercial imperatives of capitalist media institutions determine a range of available content, restrict access and ownership and, inevitably, reproduce hegemonies that help to maintain unequal power relations. Many cultural studies scholars shift the focus to the microscopic, localized consumption of media audiences, with some contending that a repertoire of appropriative strategies regularly confound these forces of domination, particularly in the hands of those whose marginal status cultivates interpretive ingenuity. Some scrutinize fan subcultures, arguing that collective audience engagement facilitates resistive activity. Such claims emanate from ethnographic audience study, generally via focus groups, interviews, and observation.(1)

In an effort to spearhead a unifying direction for critical/cultural media studies, a "multiperspectival" approach blending analyses of production, text, and consumption has been recommended (see Kellner, 1992; Harms & Dickens, 1996, pp. 224-225). While it is difficult to thoroughly dissect all three levels in a single, small-scale effort, attempts have been made to intertwine two levels in one analysis or multiple levels in succeeding investigations. Gender-related work has been in the forefront of this effort. Examples include O'Brien's (1996) exploration of the texts and historical and institutional contexts of Disney animated features and Livingstone and Liebes' (1995) textual consideration of motherhood on American soaps as informed by their earlier audience inquiries (Liebes & Katz, 1990; Livingstone, 1990). As Livingstone and Liebes (1995, p. 157) note, "audience research is in danger of replacing textual analysis by studies of audience response without asking what viewers are responding to." Condit (1989, p. 120) concurs and adds that ignoring the "presumed intents of sources" can exacerbate this blind spot.

This essay examines soap opera "cyberfandom"--computer-mediated communication (CMC) and culture in cyberspace discussion groups devoted to television serials--to assess the ways in which these forums welcome and/or inhibit the voices of traditionally marginalized viewers. The study was conducted through "virtual" ethnography entailing participant observation by this researcher over a four year period in discussion groups on Usenet and information services such as CompuServe and America Online (AOL).(2) This essay will endeavor to interrelate analyses of the contextual/institutional imperatives of soap opera production with the interactions and interpretations of cyberfans and the conditions and structures under which these interactions occur. Ultimately, the investigation refutes claims of resistive public space, finding that industry infiltration, "netiquette," and other factors construct these thrums as sites of "escape" rather than "politics." Moreover, matters significant to older women and minorities are slighted, reproducing the "divide and flatter" demographics strategy of the advertisers and their media cohorts.

Cyberspace and Empowerment

"There is no race. There are no genders. There is no age. There are no infirmities. There are only minds. Is it Utopia? No, it's the Internet." So posits a 1996 commercial for MCI. In fact, the information superhighway, with its numerous web sites, online services, and discussion groups, has been characterized by some as a panacea providing for potentially empowering and open exchanges of information and opinion and by others as another communication technology to be commodified by "the powers that be" and used to protect and extend their vested interests.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

"No Politics Here": Age and Gender in Soap Opera "Cyberfandom"


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?