Should We Retire Social Security?

By Aaron, Henry J.; Reischauer, Robert D. | Brookings Review, Winter 1999 | Go to article overview

Should We Retire Social Security?


Aaron, Henry J., Reischauer, Robert D., Brookings Review


Grading the Reform Plans

Most Americans understand that Social Security faces a long-term imbalance between the cost of benefits promised under current law and the program's projected income. They realize that the looming deficits arise from the coming retirement of the large baby boom cohort, the steady increase in life expectancies, and the reduction in fertility rates, not from program mismanagement.

Nevertheless, many wonder whether Social Security, devised during the Great Depression, amidst double-digit unemployment, pervasive poverty, and the inability of all but a few to save for retirement, is suitable for today's vastly changed economic, social, and financial conditions.

Today, policymakers and the public face a bewildering array of proposals to reform or replace the nation's public pension system. Fortunately for the interested citizen, most proposals take one of three approaches to reform. Some replace the current public system with private accounts. Others supplement the current system with private accounts. Still others strengthen and modernize the current system. In what follows we evaluate several prominent plans from each of the three major reform approaches, as well as sketch out one of our own. All the plans would restore financial balance to the nation's basic retirement system.

Criteria for Reform

We evaluate each plan on four criteria: benefit adequacy, protection against risk, administrative efficiency, and effect on national saving.

In our view a successful plan should, first, ensure adequate benefits that are equitably distributed to maintain protection for low earners and other vulnerable people. Current Social Security benefits are not unduly generous. Benefits of average earners who retire in the United States at age 65 are less than 1.5 times the U.S. poverty threshold. U.S. benefits replace significantly less of pre-retirement earnings than do public pension benefits in Europe. Large benefit cuts would leave retirees, the disabled, and survivors inadequately protected. At the same time, overall benefit increases are also undesirable because they would push costs, which will grow as baby boomers retire, to very high levels.

Second, the plan should spread broadly the unavoidable risks of long-term pension commitments, not place them on the shoulders of individual workers. Third, administrative costs should be low, and the plan should not be unduly complex for private businesses, workers, and the government. Finally, the plan should raise national saving by adding to reserves held in the Trust Fund or individual accounts (less any reductions in private saving or government surpluses outside of the retirement system).

Retiring Social Security

Two prominent plans would replace the current Social Security system with individual retirement accounts.

The Personal Security Accounts Plan

The Personal Security Accounts (PSA) plan, advanced by five members of the 1994-96 Advisory Council on Social Security, would gradually replace Social Security with a two-tier system--a flat benefit based on years worked and the age at which benefits are first received and a benefit based on balances accumulated in mandated personal savings accounts. The flat benefit for workers and their spouses, as well as disability and survivor benefits that would be retained but scaled back, would be financed by a payroll tax of 6.2 percent for employers and 1.2 percent for employees; 5 percent of each worker's earnings, up to the maximum subject to the payroll tax, would go into his or her personal account. (The Social Security payroll tax is 12.4 percent of taxable wages--6.2 percent on the employer, 6.2 percent on the worker.)

The PSA plan would be phased in over many years. Retirees and workers over age 55 would remain under the Social Security system. Workers between 25 and 55 would receive a blend of benefits under the new and old systems.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Should We Retire Social Security?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.