Building of a Corporate Memory for Traffic-Accident Analysis

By Dieng, Rose; Giboin, Alain et al. | AI Magazine, Winter 1998 | Go to article overview

Building of a Corporate Memory for Traffic-Accident Analysis


Dieng, Rose, Giboin, Alain, Amerge, Christelle, Corby, Olivier, Despres, Sylvie, Alpay, Laurence, Labidi, Sofiane, Lapalut, Stephane, AI Magazine


There is an increasing industrial interest in the capitalization of knowledge (that is, both theoretical knowledge and practical know-how) of groups of people in an organization, such groups being possibly dispersed geographically. The coherent integration of this dispersed knowledge in a corporation is called corporate memory (Steels 1993). The memory of an enterprise includes not only a technical memory obtained by capitalization of its employees' know-how but also an organizational memory related to the past and present organizational structures of the enterprise (human resources, management, and so on) and project memories for capitalizing lessons and experience from given projects (Pomian 1996). Tourtier (1995) distinguishes profession memory, composed of the referential, documents, tools, and methods used in a given profession; society memory, related to organization, activities, products, and participants (for example, customers, suppliers, subcontractors); individual memory, characterized by status, competencies, know-how, and activities of a given member of the enterprise; and project memory, comprised of the project definition, activities, history, and results.

The construction of a corporate memory requires abilities to manage disparate know-how and heterogeneous viewpoints, make this knowledge accessible to the adequate members of the enterprise, and integrate and store this knowledge in paper-based or electronic documents or in knowledge bases or case bases that should be easily accessible, usable, and maintainable. The solutions offered by research (Macintosh 1994) to this problem crucial in industry (Morizet-Mahoudeaux 1994) can be related to the analysis and modeling of an enterprise (Fox 1993; Fox, Chionglo, and Fadel 1993); its evolution through time; the experience acquired from past projects; the integration of models of expertise from different groups in an organization into a coherent corporate-expertise model; the construction and integration of distributed, heterogeneous knowledge bases or knowledge-based systems, possibly stemming from multiple experts; the development of an intelligent documentary system (Ballay and Poitou 1996; Poitou 1995); the management of hypertext links between knowledge bases and documents (Martin and Alpay 1996); knowledge sharing between different groups; the exploitation of Al techniques such as case-based reasoning (Simon 1996; Simon and Grandbastien 1995; Kitano et al. 1992); the exploitation of multiagent systems (Oliveira and Shmeil 1995; Vandenberghe and de Azevedo 1995); the exploitation of the web (Huynh, Popkin, and Stecker 1994); and natural language document-analysis techniques (Trigano 1994).

As noted in Nonaka (1991) and Van Engers et al. (1995), the knowledge chain consists of seven links: (1) listing the existing knowledge, (2) determining the required knowledge, (3) developing new knowledge, (4) allocating new and existing knowledge, (5) applying knowledge, (6) maintaining knowledge, and (7) disposing of knowledge. Thus, we can consider the building of the corporate memory as relying on the steps outlined in figure 1.

[Figure 1 ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

Detection of needs in corporate memory: This needs detection can be based on advisability analysis, allowing the determination of crucial knowledge to be kept in the corporate memory (Grundstein and Barthes 1996), or on the exploitation of enterprise models (Uschold et al. 1996; Fraser 1994). This phase can help to determine the potential users of the corporate memory and, perhaps, the possible modes of exploitation useful and adapted to their work environment.

Construction of the corporate memory: The adopted techniques depend on the sources from which the corporate memory can be built (specialists, paper-based or electronic documents such as reports or technical documentation, existing databases or case studies, dictionaries) and the nature of the needed corporate memory according to the intended users (paper-based documents versus electronic documents, a documentary system; formal knowledge versus informal knowledge; knowledge base versus case base). …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Building of a Corporate Memory for Traffic-Accident Analysis
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.