Commons and Keynes: Their Assault on Laissez Faire

By Atkinson, Glen; Oleson, Theodore, Jr. | Journal of Economic Issues, December 1998 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Commons and Keynes: Their Assault on Laissez Faire

Atkinson, Glen, Oleson, Theodore, Jr., Journal of Economic Issues

In his remarks upon receiving the Veblen-Commons Award from the Association for Evolutionary Economics, Wallace Peterson said that "Keynes and institutionalism are the two major intertwined threads in my work as an economist" [Peterson 1992, 337]. A few years later, on the occasion of receiving his Veblen-Commons Award, Hyman Minsky quoted from a letter that John Maynard Keynes wrote to John R. Commons in 1927 in which he said "there seems to me to be no other economist with whose general way of thinking I feel myself in such general accord" [Minsky 1996, 357]. Similarly, Robert Skidelsky, in a recent biography of Keynes, describes Commons as "an important, if unacknowledged influence on Keynes" [Skidelsky 1995, 229]. These remarks encouraged us to explore the reasons for the sympathy Keynes and institutionalists have expressed for each other's work. We examined the similarities and differences between Keynes and Commons to find what insights they might have for current institutional investigations.

Both Keynes and Commons dissented from orthodox economic theory and methods, but neither sought an alternative to capitalism. Instead, each was interested in developing institutions necessary to save capitalism, given the developments in the economy in the early decades of the twentieth century. Their dissents and positive contributions shared two interrelated elements that we will document in this paper. First, they shared a skeptical attitude toward deterministic models based on pure reason or even on objective statements of mathematical probability. Second, they each were determined to incorporate money and other pecuniary institutions into the body of economic theory. We will set the stage for discussing these concepts, uncertainty and pecuniary institutions, with a brief section on the intellectual environment of the times and the personalities of these two men.

The Men and Their Times

Peter Bernstein recently suggested that "the revolutionary idea that defines the boundary between modern times and the past is the mastery of risk" [Bernstein 1996, 1]. The mastery of risk is the basis of "the notion that the future is more than a whim of the gods and that men and women are not passive before nature. Until human beings discovered a way across that boundary, the future was a mirror of the past or the murky domain of oracles and soothsayers who held a monopoly over knowledge of anticipated events" [Bernstein 1996, 1]. The way across this boundary was the development of the mathematics of probability. Probability analysis allowed prediction of the future and the risk or likelihood of alternatives. By the first decade of the twentieth century, probability scholars believed that risk was mastered or at least estimated.

At the same time, the English neoclassical school of economics completed its deductive model of self-interested individuals making choices. These choices inevitably lead the system back to the best of all possible equilibrium positions with output and employment always moving toward their maximum through the operation of flexible prices. Probability analysis completes this analytical system by depicting the movements between equilibria when risk affects choice. Rather than a single outcome, there is a range of possible outcomes that can be evaluated using probability and expected values.

As Bernstein tells the story, World War I shattered the optimism behind these models of human behavior [Bernstein 1996, 215-216]. How could rational people in the most civilized societies engage in such barbaric behavior for such ambiguous objectives? This loss of innocence shifted research from risk to uncertainty and the limits of rational models. Both Keynes and Commons came to the study of uncertainty and the need to stabilize the economy during this period. While they came from extremely different social and academic settings, they arrived at substantially similar conclusions.

John Maynard Keynes was born into an affluent family and educated at the best schools.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Commons and Keynes: Their Assault on Laissez Faire


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?