Testing the Limits or Limiting the Tests?

By Zirkel, Perry A. | Phi Delta Kappan, December 1998 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Testing the Limits or Limiting the Tests?

Zirkel, Perry A., Phi Delta Kappan

IN THE WAKE of the Kentucky Supreme Court's sweeping school finance decision in 1989, the state legislature enacted a comprehensive school reform statute that became effective on 13 July 1990.1 One of the mandates was that the state board of education create and implement "a statewide, primarily performance-based assessment program to ensure school accountability for student achievement" of the seven goals codified from the court's decision. These goals included, for example, "communications skills necessary to function in a complex and changing civilization," "knowledge to make economic, social, and political choices," and "sufficient self-knowledge and knowledge of [the student's] mental and physical wellness."2

The legislation further required that, by the 1991-92 school year, an interim assessment test be given to students in grades 4, 8, and 12 and that the permanent assessment start no later than the 1995-96 school year. Thus the state board contracted with an outside organization to create the Kentucky Instructional Results Information System (KIRIS) exam, which assesses student skills in reading, math, writing, science, and social studies.3

The primary purpose of the KIRIS test is to evaluate the progress of schools, not individual students. First, scores for individual students are categorized into performance levels, ranging from "novice" (0 points) to "distinguished" (140 points). Next, through a fairly complicated formula, the results for individual students are computed into an overall school rating. The raw data include not only these individual scores but also other school performance indicators, such as attendance, dropout, and retention rates. Those schools in which students show overall improvement on the KIRIS test receive financial rewards, and those in which the composite ratings drop receive sanctions, such as having the staff placed on probation.

Early in 1994, in anticipation of the upcoming administration of the KIRIS tests, the parents of Chad Triplett, a high school senior, and his sister Tracey, an eighth-grader, informed the Livingston County School System that they did not want their children to participate in the testing. The state board of education advised the Livingston administration that the school would be assigned a "novice" level for any child whose KIRIS data were missing. Consequently, on 14 February 1994, the Livingston school board adopted a policy requiring all students to complete the KIRIS assessment before advancing to the next grade or graduating.

Immediately on learning of the policy, Mrs. Triplett requested to review the tests. On 16 and 18 February, the school authorities allowed her to examine them. But they did not allow her to take any notes or to make any copies.

Basing their objections primarily on religious grounds, the Tripletts refused to allow Chad and Tracey to participate in the spring KIRIS testing. As a result, though they met all other requirements, Chad failed to graduate, and Tracey was not promoted to the ninth grade.

On 25 May 1994, the Tripletts filed suit against the Livingston board, seeking a permanent injunction to prevent the board from not allowing Chad to graduate and Tracey to be promoted. They also sought a declaratory judgment that the testing requirement violated various constitutional rights, including their rights to privacy, to freedom of religion, and to parental liberty and their rights under certain statutes, such as the federal Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act, which is commonly known as FERPA.

After receiving affidavits from both parties, including voluminous expert opinions concerning the KIRIS test, the court granted the school board's motion for summary judgment, effectively dismissing the Tripletts' suit. However, the court ruled in their favor in terms of a public right to view the KIRIS exam questions. Both parties appealed to the state's appellate court.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Testing the Limits or Limiting the Tests?


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?