Special Issue: Maintaining and Developing Quality in Institutions of Higher Education in the 21st Century

By Lakomski, Gabriele; Marshall, Stephen J. | Australian Journal of Education, November 1998 | Go to article overview

Special Issue: Maintaining and Developing Quality in Institutions of Higher Education in the 21st Century


Lakomski, Gabriele, Marshall, Stephen J., Australian Journal of Education


Editor's introduction

The issue of quality in higher education is even more elusive than it is in other human endeavours. To use a well-worn but eminently serviceable cliche, quality, like beauty, is in the eye of the beholder. Depending on the social, political, economic or educational context in which the discussion on quality is conducted, it will look different, mean different things, and will lead to different practical proposals of how to bring it about, or to maintain it.

It is not overstating the case to observe that the context in which institutions of higher education must presently operate is mainly shaped by economic performance, viability, and accountability. This in itself is not a bad thing. It becomes counterproductive, however, when the value-driven economic imperative outweighs other concerns on the assumption that the economic agenda is the only defensible game in town driven by purportedly objective criteria. The kind of framework imposed by economic criteria that `one size fits all', and that the same economic criteria can be applied across different institutions, faculties and disciplines in equal measure and with the same justification, shortchanges and thus distorts the significant differences between them. For example, the quality of a university might, among other things, be measured by the provisions it makes for the teaching of less marketable fields of studies like the classics, history, or philosophy. This is, of course, a very old-fashioned small T view of what a university should be doing, and how it should in part define its mission. Old-fashioned it might be but, at the same time, who is to say that such studies do not contribute to making better practitioners -- of the law, of teaching, of medicine, etc.? Some are only too readily seduced by a narrow conception of professional education which emphasises skills and techniques at the expense of teaching the relevant contexts, broadly understood, which, in fact, determine what these skills mean and how they will be applied. Split the two apart -- context from skill and technique -- and we end up training, rather than educating, and producing technocrats who are not intellectually flexible or knowledgeable enough to meet challenges successfully and creatively.

The above view is, of course, my view and no-one else's. However, my general concern is shared by the guest editor and is reflected in various ways by his contributors. The impressive array of writers commissioned by Stephen Marshall examine the issue of maintaining and developing quality in institutions of higher education in the 21st century from the vantage points of their respective responsibilities which cover many of the central functions of institutions of higher education. They cover the ground reflectively and critically. Their contributions provide the kind of intellectual effort needed to place the quality agenda in its broader context and thus to ensure that we gain a better understanding of how to shape institutions for the next century responsibly.

Gabriele Lakomski

Introduction by Guest Editor

Quality has always been an issue within the higher education sector in Australia and elsewhere. However, the last decade has seen the issue of quality in higher education brought to the forefront of political agendas, as governments and communities demand higher education institutions be more accountable for their efforts. But what is meant by `quality' in higher education? What are, or should be, our goals in relation to quality in this context? How can we realise these goals? These issues have been debated at length in Australia and elsewhere. Numerous articles, books, and theses have been written, exploring such topics as:

* quality and disciplinary differences

* quality assurance and quality improvement

* quality management and performance measures/indicators

* quality assessment and traditional university values

* the quality of students' experiences of higher education.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Special Issue: Maintaining and Developing Quality in Institutions of Higher Education in the 21st Century
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.