Is the Problem Television or Viewers?

The American Enterprise, March 1999 | Go to article overview

Is the Problem Television or Viewers?


A DEBATE BETWEEN MICHAEL MEDVED & DAVID HOROWITZ

To interject some healthy dissent into the live conference on which this issue of TAE is based, we invited two distinguished conservatives and authorities on popular entertainment who have sharply different views of TV--Michael Medved and David Horowitz--to debate the state of our airwaves. Medved suggests that today's TV is fundamentally corrosive, and urges consumers to be extremely discriminating. Horowitz argues TV has never been better, and that it has bad effects on only a small part of its audience.

The two speakers stake out their sharply divergent views in alternating statements, then engage each other's arguments, and finally address some questions briefly at the end of the debate.

DAVID HOROWITZ: I'm used to being the skunk at the garden party, but it's usually not this kind of party. I disagree with the view of television this morning's speakers have presented, and with their idea of TV's influence. I thought the documentary "Wasteland" was a total misrepresentation of what television is about.

No effort was made to distinguish between network TV, cable TV, pay-perview TV. "Linc" is a black sitcom on Showtime, which you have to buy. The documentary made no effort to distinguish betweens shows on at 8:00 P.M. and shows on at 11:00 P.M. "Linc" is on late at night, as is one of the soft porn shows shown. By the way, the central character on "Linc" is a conservative.

It's bizarre to have Newt Minow quoted about the TV "wasteland." When he called network TV a wasteland, there were three networks. I remember seeing as a youngster all sorts of quality programs on those networks, including a modern opera, the NBC symphony, the Hallmark Hall of Fame's original plays featuring young actors like Paul Newman. There was also a professor who lectured on Shakespeare, as well as Bishop Sheen.

Today's television is a minimum of a 60-channel universe. If all three networks then were decent, we have at least 12 times as many decent channels now. We have the Discovery Channel, the Learning Channel, the History Channel, the Biography Channel, three C-SPAN channels. We have CNBC, MSNBC, and the Fox News Channel, as well as public television. And then there's Court TV. If a major trial or an important congressional hearing is taking place, you can see it on four or five different channels. And this is just the beginning. TV is going to explode into a 500-channel universe very soon.

For freedom, free markets, and free expression, this is an amazing development.

As for the impact that TV has on America, I recall attending the Clinton-Gore event where they launched the V-chip. They had one professor after another get up and tell us, "You've seen a hundred thousand murders by the time you're an adult, and this desensitizes you to human suffering, and this has a large impact on the violence in society."

Come on. Everybody in this room, then, has seen a hundred thousand murders. Do we have any serial killers here? Exactly the same television is watched in South Central Los Angeles and Beverly Hills; in Detroit, Michigan and Windsor, Canada. But Detroit has a murder rate vastly higher than Windsor, Canada.

Television can have an impact if you have no family, if you're in an abusive home. You'll see violence on television, and it might inspire you to commit more. But TV is like rap music. Do you think suburban kids, listening to rap, talking about shooting cops and beating up their bitches, then go out, join gangs and do that? It doesn't happen.

Being conservative, I'm more sensitive than liberals to the protection of children, but I think TV's effect is much overrated. And I don't think conservatives should imitate liberalism's campaign against the tobacco companies as a model for what to do to TV.

True, there are some shows that are out of line, from my standard. But we live in an incredibly diverse culture, and not all of it will please everybody. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Is the Problem Television or Viewers?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.