Russian Subsidies and Nuclear Security

By Paige, Sean | Insight on the News, April 5, 1999 | Go to article overview

Russian Subsidies and Nuclear Security


Paige, Sean, Insight on the News


U.S. taxpayers spent billions of dollars during the Cold War keeping the Pentagon one step ahead of the Soviets in the arms race. And since the big thaw, taxpayers are spending millions more -- actually billions, troth be told -- helping a cash-strapped Russia dismantle the nuclear arsenal that her erstwhile leaders once boasted would "bury" us.

The added expenditures are necessary, we are told, to help the Russians comply with arms-control treaties and safely dismantle their nuclear infrastructure. The expenditures also keep Russia's top scientists occupied, decreasing the likelihood of nuclear proliferation by reducing the incentives their technicians and scientists may have to peddle their know-how to gate crashers at the atomic country club. Combined, U.S. programs focused on nuclear-nonproliferation assistance to the Newly Independent States, or NIS, so far have spent more than $2 billion trying to subsidize our way toward nuclear security.

But a review of the Department of Energy's Initiatives for Proliferation Prevention program, or IPP, raises serious doubts about where the money is going and whether U.S. security is being enhanced.

According to the General Accounting Office, or GAO, only 37 percent ($23.7 million) of the $63 million spent so far by the IPP actually found its way into the coffers of research institutes or the pockets of individuals in the NIS. U.S. nuclear labs administering the program, together with several dozen participating companies, have skimmed off63 percent of the money meant to put food on the table for their potentially desperate counterparts in Eastern Europe.

That may not be as bad as it at first sounds, however, since at least some of the funds that do go overseas, rather than finding their way onto the dinner tables of former Soviet scientists supposedly beating swords into plowshares, instead are going into the pockets of people still building the swords. Disturbingly, the GAO found that DOE officials have only the foggiest notion about how many scientists they are subsidizing and which formerly Soviet nuclear-research institutes are receiving exactly what amounts of money. "Some scientists working on Russia's weapons of mass destruction program are receiving [U.S.] funds" GAO concluded.

The GAO also reports that IPP's efforts to find commercial applications for Soviet weapons research may have resulted in the export to Russia of "dual use" technologies -- transfers, says the GAO, that "could negatively affect U.S. national-security interests." And finally, the GAO criticized as "cursory" the process by which IPP projects were reviewed for national-security implications -- even projects concerning biological or chemical weapons.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Russian Subsidies and Nuclear Security
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.