The Creation and Circulation of Endogenous Money: A Circuit Dynamique Approach

By Rochon, Louis-Philippe | Journal of Economic Issues, March 1999 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

The Creation and Circulation of Endogenous Money: A Circuit Dynamique Approach


Rochon, Louis-Philippe, Journal of Economic Issues


Endogenous money has traditionally been recognized as the quasi-exclusive domain of Post Keynesian political economy, and many authors consider it the "coping stone" of Post Keynesian macroeconomics [Chick 1995; Palley 1992].

But as the paradigm developed, disagreements over how money becomes endogenous lead to crucial debates about the nature and mechanics of endogeneity. In this journal, L. Randall Wray [1992] has summarized the various approaches to money both in orthodox and heterodox traditions. This led to a subsequent debate, again in this journal, between Wray [1995] and Basil Moore [1995]. This has raised questions as to whether Post Keynesians are united in their views on money [Trautwein 1995]. Robert Pollin [1991] had previously identified two distinct approaches within Post Keynesian thought: the structuralists and the accommodationists - or horizontalists, following Moore. And while some [Pollin 1996] see the differences as irreconcilable, others [see Moore 1996; Lavoie 1996a] insist the differences are largely a matter of emphasis rather than substance. Since then, it has appeared that these differences have widened rather than narrowed.

These debates, however, have masked crucial arguments with respect to Post Keynesian monetary theory. In particular, most Post Keynesians have failed to notice that, in some respect, Post Keynesian monetary theory shares many insights with orthodox theory. Emphasis is placed on the supply and demand of money as an asset and where the existence of money itself is linked to uncertainty (yet again, money as an asset). The treatment of money resulting from a credit-flow and discussion of its creation, circulation, and destruction have become secondary issues.

These shortcomings have generated an alternative Post Keynesian approach, one that is critical of orthodox monetary thought, but also of "mainstream" Post Keynesian economics, or what I have elsewhere called "neo-Post Keynesianism" [Rochon 1999a]. According to these heterodox economists, alternatively labeled circulationists or circuitists, Post Keynesian monetary theory does not constitute a clear enough alternative to orthodox monetary thought.

While there is significant common ground between these two Post Keynesian groups, there are also some important differences. In fact, Stephen Rousseas [1996, 677] claims that both approaches are "related." For Marcello Messori [1985, 210] they are "complementary," while for Richard Arena [1996, 431] they are "more complementary than analogous." While they are definitely complementary, the theory of the monetary circuit must be seen as a more "general" approach and a better foundation for developing a monetary theory of production in the heterodox tradition, while neo-Post Keynesian theory can be inserted within this more global approach.

An interesting way of seeing each approach is to argue that both are rooted in Keynes, although a very different Keynes. Post Keynesians take the General Theory as the starting point and then try to reconcile Keynes's later writings in the Economic Journal with it. These articles are then seen as an attempt by Keynes to clarify or to defend the General Theory. The other approach [see Rochon 1997] sees the post-General Theory articles as wholly different, an attempt by Keynes to distance himself from some aspects of the General Theory. In this sense, it is the General Theory that ought to be interpreted in light of the views developed within the Economic Journal articles. Circuitists have developed a different aspect of Keynes, seeing him as more radical than Post Keynesians would care to admit (see also Keynes's Treatise on Money).

The purpose of this article, however, is not to explore the intricate differences between the two approaches; I will leave this to the reader upon which to carefully reflect. Rather, I propose to outline the broad themes of this Post Keynesian alternative approach to credit and money endogeneity.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

The Creation and Circulation of Endogenous Money: A Circuit Dynamique Approach
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?