Cited page

Citations are available only to our active members. Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

X X

Cited page

Display options
Reset

Writing and Other Communication Standards in Undergraduate Business Education: A Study of Current Program Requirements, Practices, and Trends

By: Knight, Melinda | Business Communication Quarterly, March 1999 | Article details

Look up
Saved work (0)

matching results for page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?
While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.

Writing and Other Communication Standards in Undergraduate Business Education: A Study of Current Program Requirements, Practices, and Trends


Knight, Melinda, Business Communication Quarterly


In the last several years, communication faculty in business schools have feared that the International Association for Management Education's (AACSB) "50% rule," mandating that no more than half the courses for an undergraduate business degree can be taught in the business school itself, would eliminate their programs in the face of more powerful departments like finance, accounting, and marketing. Happily for the profession, the study discussed in this article suggests these fears are ungrounded. Business communication is thriving and is more likely than not to be a required core course in business schools. Specifically, the study examined current writing and communication standards in top-ranked undergraduate business schools. It aimed to identify existing practices, including the kinds of requirements in effect, the number of courses involved, the institutional home of these courses (whether in the business school or in a liberal arts department), and major skills stressed. This information is presented mainly in tabular form in this article. The discussion section identifies some trends that emerge from the study.

Method

The study sample reflects the most recent, or rather only, ranking of the Top 50 undergraduate programs by U.S. News and World Report (1996) (available on the Web page: www4.usnews.com/usnews/edu/college/rankings/catl2spc.htm). Such rankings are, of course, a potentially flawed source that may ignore many excellent schools. But the ranking helps to identify benchmark institutions for curricular redesign because students, faculty, administrators, alumni, and the larger business community take rankings seriously. Tied scores mean that the sample actually includes 52 schools. All these schools are accredited by the AACSB, another important factor in determining a useful sample, and they also represent a good geographical mix.

My original focus on "writing" shifted to reflect the realities of professional management education, which often includes oral communication; so oral communication requirements are also noted. To further examine the 50 percent rule, I recorded the institutional home of the business communication courses and related that to lower-division (often in the liberal arts) and upper-division courses.

Official Web sites of the 52 institutions provided the information for my study, with follow-up verification by e-mail. While Web sites are not always up to date, they provided an excellent starting point for gathering policies as well as course listings and syllabi. I …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Select text to:

Select text to:

  • Highlight
  • Cite a passage
  • Look up a word
Learn more Close
Loading One moment ...
Highlight
Select color
Change color
Delete highlight
Cite this passage
Cite this highlight
View citation

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?