The Trajectory of Family Change in Nigeria

By Heaton, Tim; Hirschl, Tom A. | Journal of Comparative Family Studies, Winter 1999 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

The Trajectory of Family Change in Nigeria


Heaton, Tim, Hirschl, Tom A., Journal of Comparative Family Studies


INTRODUCTION

Ethnic cleavage constitutes a continuing problem in sub-Saharan Africa where national boundaries reflect the commercial and military interests of colonial powers to the neglect of pre-existing tribal and regional experiences of the African people. Once the national boundaries were drawn, there was little incentive for the colonial powers to promote national integration since 'divide and conquer' represents a cost-effective means of colonial rule. This appears to have been the case in Nigeria which encompasses three major regional ethnic cultures, and under colonial rule was governed by a British controlled system that promoted regional and ethnic autonomy (Asiwaja, 1976; Carland, 1985). These pre-colonial and colonial experiences may partially explain the high level of inter-ethnic conflict during Nigeria's post-colonial era (Atanda, 1989). Since becoming a sovereign nation in 1960, Nigeria has experienced continuous ethnic cleavage, including a civil war that took the lives of between one and three million persons (Lovejoy, 1992:60).

In this paper we investigate the question of ethnic differences from the vantage point of the family. Are Nigerian families on a similar trajectory, or are ethnic differences in family organization failing to diminish? To the extent that structural and socioeconomic forces are operating throughout the country that promote particular forms of family organization, then we surmise that a process of national convergence is underway, even if substantial ethnic differentials remain. If family ethnic differences fail to move toward convergence in the face of common structural and socioeconomic forces, then we would surmise there is a lack of cohesion in this important dimension of social organization.

The family represents a potentially important source of inter-ethnic differentiation because it is a primary locus for biological reproduction, child socialization and education, socialization of gender roles, economic consumption, economic distribution, and in the case of a largely agrarian society such as Nigeria, economic production. It may be possible for ethnic groups to gain a greater sense of national identity in the absence of converging family organization, perhaps through common experiences in other major institutions such as the state and the broader economy. However, we believe that convergence (or lack thereof) in family organization provides independent evidence of expansion of a national culture across ethnic lines.

The persistence of ethnic differences in family organization within nation states has significant policy ramifications because nations are the primary administrative locus for international family planning policy efforts. International agencies typically provide funds, research knowledge, and administrative support to national policy functionaries who allocate and apply these resources within the nation state. In the context of sub-Saharan Africa, these efforts are nominally intended to hasten fertility decline and enhance the status of women. At least in theory family planning policy takes into account ethnic and regional differences, but in practice there may be reasons to question the efficacy of such policy. This is especially the case in sub-Saharan Africa where ethnic cleavage continues to be a salient, if sometimes violent, social process.

Concern over persistent high fertility in Africa has led researchers to examine a variety of family behaviors that underlie attainment of large families (Lesthaeghe, 1989; Caldwell et al., 1992). The intermediate variables framework coupled with the theory of multiphasic response developed by Davis and Blake sensitizes us to the complexity of fertility change. Work by Bongaarts (1985) and others indicates that certain intermediate variables exhibit greater variation, and are thus more critical in accounting for fertility change (Adeokun, 1985; Chimere-Dan, 1990b).

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

The Trajectory of Family Change in Nigeria
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?