Faith: What's History Got to Do with It?

By Appleby, R. Scott | U.S. Catholic, June 1999 | Go to article overview

Faith: What's History Got to Do with It?


Appleby, R. Scott, U.S. Catholic


The church has evolved and changed throughout its history. Has this evolution served to sully the "pure" teachings of Jesus?

SIXTH IN A 10-PART SERIES ON CHURCH HISTORY

And Jesus said to his apostles: "I am the eschatalogical prophet, the proleptic fulfillment of human destiny, the preexistent Logos incarnate, the second person of the Holy Trinity, of the same substance (homoousion) as the Father." And the apostles, scratching their heads, replied, "Huh?"

This well-worn joke, scolding theologians for their reliance on arcane terminology, points to a fundamental fact about the Christian faith: it developed over time. The Aramaic-speaking Jesus did not conduct crash courses in Greek philosophy or the finer details of the Trinity. Drawing on concepts and terminology of their respective cultures, later generations asked their own questions of Jesus. Indeed, the wording of the Apostles' Creed owed as much to Hellenistic thought as to the first-century Jewish milieu in which Christian belief originated.

The discovery that major tenets of the faith "evolved" over centuries can give a naive believer pause. I remember my sense of surprise spreading into mild alarm when it was revealed to me (by my seventh-grade CCD teacher) that the dogma of Mary's bodily assumption into heaven had been proclaimed infallibly only 19 years earlier, in 1950. Had Jesus taught everything Catholics are supposed to believe? If so, why had it taken the church 19 centuries to elevate the Assumption to "must-believe" status? And if Jesus had not taught this, on what grounds did the pope presume to do so?

The notion of doctrinal development became widespread in the 19th century, when history itself was coming into its own as a critical discipline based on empirical evidence and employing sophisticated "scientific" methods. In the 18th century, a few intrepid pioneers had begun to study the Bible itself as a historical document. The rise of linguistics, archaeology, literary criticism, and the study of comparative religions triggered a "crisis of historical consciousness" in the 19th. The far-reaching impact of Darwinism reinforced the growing conviction of the educated class that seemingly random processes of evolution--substantial change over time--lay behind the origin of species and might also explain the striking variety of cultures, values, and moral norms.

Truth suddenly seemed relative to the society espousing it. When compared with other religions, or analyzed in light of what it had borrowed from the cultures in which it had flourished, Christianity seemed less and less distinctive and transcendent. Admitting that the church had a history meant that it, too, had changed substantially, like other human societies.

Not every influential Catholic accounted change a sign of weakness, however. Cardinal John Henry Newman argued that the church's sagacious adaptation to different cultural environments was a mark of its perfection. He wrote an eloquent and profound treatise on the development of doctrine and thereby reinforced the orthodoxy of the concept.

By the dawn of the 20th century, Alfred Loisy, a French priest and budding Bible scholar (and fan of Newman), could confidently proclaim that the dogmas of the Catholic religion "did not fall from heaven directly into the pontifical lap." Rather, they evolved with increasing complexity and precision as each generation added its own nuances of meaning.

The first great theological debate of the 20th century articulated what was at stake for Christianity in the crisis of historical consciousness. Treatise rather than television was the medium; the debaters--Loisy and Adolf von Harnack, the renowned German Lutheran historian of dogma--never appeared together, preferring to let their books do their talking. Harnack's The Essence of Christianity appeared in 1900. Loisy's rejoinder, The Gospel and the Church, followed in 1902.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Faith: What's History Got to Do with It?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.