Dennis Rodman-"Barbie Doll Gone Horribly Wrong": Marginalized Masculinity, Cross-Dressing, and the Limitations of Commodity Culture

By Dunbar, Michele D. | The Journal of Men's Studies, Spring 1999 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Dennis Rodman-"Barbie Doll Gone Horribly Wrong": Marginalized Masculinity, Cross-Dressing, and the Limitations of Commodity Culture


Dunbar, Michele D., The Journal of Men's Studies


This article explores the relationship between NBA player Dennis Rodman's marginalized masculinity as a black male, his cross-dressing and gender play, and his location in consumer media culture. Through ethnographic content analysis of Rodman's media image on MTV (a new and emerging site for the study of sport and media), this paper explores the effects of Rodman's gender play, asking whether Rodman's image provides a challenge or disruption to prevailing notions of masculinity. Overall, Rodman's cross-dressing does little to offer a critique of hegemonic masculinity, but rather, serves to signal his own marginalized black masculinity. His gender play seems to be contained within heterosexual, and even hyper-masculine, boundaries that reproduce the very racist and sexist notions of black masculinity against which hegemonic masculinity is stabilized.

Basketball star Dennis Rodman has become a media icon known for his eccentric visual style of self-presentation that includes bright hair colors, body art in the form of tattoos and piercings, and cross-dressing. As an African-American male athlete, he embodies the marginalized status of black masculinity that simultaneously affords him his aggressive style of play on the court and his self-proclaimed "badness." Rodman's professional status in the field of sports, where hegemonic masculinity is reproduced, makes his visual transgressions and gender play particularly important to the study of commodity culture and its impact on the consuming public. What purpose does Rodman's cross-dressing serve within the realm of commodity culture where it flourishes? Does Rodman's cross-dressing further marginalize him from the mainstream culture, and does it offer a critique of hegemonic masculinity? What can we learn about masculinity through Rodman's gender play? This paper explores these questions through an ethnographic content analysis of Dennis Rodman's media image, focusing on his Music Television (MTV) show, the Rodman Worm Tour, where Rodman is given an authorized space to express his unique visual style for a young, spectacle-driven audience.

THEORETICAL APPROACHES TO CROSS-DRESSING

Social scientific research on gender takes a social constructivist approach over essentialist notions of gender as fixed and inherent to each sex. While social norms develop around what is expected behavior and appearance for each gender, the fact remains that doing gender is a process undertaken through everyday performance (Butler, 1993; Garber, 1992; Hawkes, 1995). Dress is an important part of that performance that serves to signal one's gender and often one's sexuality, since the two are highly conflated in contemporary culture (Butler, 1993; Garber, 1992; Hawkes, 1995). Since dress as a visual indicator is so central to the construction of gender, it also has the potential to be a site of disruption and a means to offer a critique of the hegemonic social order.

Central to the study of cross-dressing and other transgender practices is the mainstream binary model of heterosexual hegemony that views sex, gender, and sexuality in terms of dichotomous categorical pairs, including male/female, masculine/feminine, and gay/straight (Garber, 1992; Hawkes, 1995; Tewksbury & Gagne, 1996). According to both Garber (1992) and Hawkes (1995), cross-dressers represent the possibility for the disruption of these dichotomous categories through their deliberate scrambling of gender codes (Hawkes, 1995, pp. 268-269) and their theoretical position as "the third" to the binary oppositions, resisting definition within the model and bringing the categories into a state of crisis (Garber, pp. 16-17).(1) According to Garber, it is this "space of possibility" (p. 17) that gives cross-dressing the power to disrupt, even without finding a single, literal meaning for itself (p. 390). At the same time, this third space of possibility represents the "other" (undefined as it may be) to the binary norm, "without which there would be no such thing as meaning in the first place" (p.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Dennis Rodman-"Barbie Doll Gone Horribly Wrong": Marginalized Masculinity, Cross-Dressing, and the Limitations of Commodity Culture
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?