Reliability of Sexual Behavior Self-Reports in Male Couples of Discordant HIV Status

By Carballo-Dieguez, Alex; Remien, Robert H. et al. | The Journal of Sex Research, May 1999 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Reliability of Sexual Behavior Self-Reports in Male Couples of Discordant HIV Status

Carballo-Dieguez, Alex, Remien, Robert H., Dolezal, Curtis, Wagner, Glenn, The Journal of Sex Research

Given the presence of strong cultural taboos against the direct observation of people's sexual activities, most sex researchers rely heavily on self-reports (Catania et al., 1993). Therefore, the reliability of these measures is of crucial importance. Attempts to assess reliability have involved contrasting long- and short-term behavioral recalls (Kauth, St. Lawrence, & Kelly, 1991; McElrath, Chitwood, Griffin, & Comerford, 1994;), comparing testretest results (Mahler, Hull, Stebinger, Perry, & Frances, 1995; McKinnon et al., 1993; Saltzman, Stoddard, McCusker, Moon, & Mayer, 1987; Weatherburn, Hunt, Davies, Coxon, & McManus, 1991), and checking the congruence of data obtained by different procedures (Boekeloo et al., 1994; James, Bignell, & Gillies, 1991; Siegel, Krauss, & Karus, 1994; Weatherbum et al., 1991) --including relating reported frequency of condom use and presence of STDs (Zenilman et al., 1995) and comparing the separate reports of primary partners (Coates et al., 1986; Darke, Hall, Heather, Ward, & Wodak, 1991; Jacobson & Moore, 1981; Kinsey, Pomeroy & Martin, 1948; Kinsey, Pomeroy, Martin, & Gebhard, 1953; Levinger, 1966; Padian, 1990; Seage, Mayer, Horsburgh, Cai, & Lamb, 1992; Upchurch et al., 1991). The results of these studies have been mixed, some finding that the self-reports were reliable and others that they were not. Overall, the studies highlighted the influence of methodological and respondent variables on reliability (for a thorough review of methodological problems in sexual behavior studies see Catania, Gibson, Chitwood, & Coates, 1990, and Catania, Kegeles, & Coates, 1990.). Finally, some authors have altogether criticized quantitative investigations of sexual behavior and have advocated, instead, for qualitative inquiries (Parker & Carballo, 1990).

If sexual matters are frequently shrouded in secrecy, sexual behavior that carries the potential of HIV transmission is likely to be even more concealed. It may be particularly difficult for people in HIV serodiscordant relationships (where one partner is HIV-positive and the other HIV-negative) to report high risk behavior given the social pressure to avoid such acts. Reliable and valid assessments of HIV-risk behaviors are critical to identify specific populations in need of intervention and to test the efficacy of any prevention program. Since no measure can be valid if not reliable, and given the absence of any published reliability study focusing specifically on HIV serodiscordant male couples, we saw a need to fill in this gap.

We had the rare opportunity of working with a group of 75 HIV-discordant male couples. We thoroughly explored the reliability of the reports the couples' members made of their behavior with each other in two ways: (a) We compared self-report to partner's report of anal sex, and (b) we analyzed the test-retest reliability of individual reports collected with a one-week interval.



Study participants were recruited in the New York Metropolitan area through leaflets distributed at gay organizations (HIV support groups, recreational clubs, etc.), advertisements in gay and AIDS-related newsletters and magazines, and by word of mouth. The eligibility criteria were (a) 18 years or older, (b) involved in a relationship with another man for at least four months, and (c) one partner being HIV-positive and the other one HIV-negative. A total of 75 male couples who fulfilled the eligibility criteria participated in the study. The participants' mean age was 36 years (SD = 8; range 22 - 66), their average education 15 years (SD = 3; range 9 - 20), and their mean annual income $37,300. Their racial/ethnic distribution was 63% Caucasian, 16% African American, and 21% Latino.


The assessment was divided in two parts: individual and joint (couple) assessment. The individual part consisted of an interviewer-administered section, which included the Sexual Practices Assessment Schedule - Couples version [SPAS-C] (Carballo-Dieguez, Exner, Gruen, & Meyer-Bahlburg, 1994; available from the first author), and a self-administered section.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Reliability of Sexual Behavior Self-Reports in Male Couples of Discordant HIV Status


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?