Locating the Politics of a Sierra Leonean Chiefdom

By Fanthorpe, Richard | Africa, Fall 1998 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Locating the Politics of a Sierra Leonean Chiefdom


Fanthorpe, Richard, Africa


ABSTRACT

The chiefdoms of Sierra Leone are institutions of colonial origin but nevertheless continue to serve as local government units in the post-colonial state. The prevailing view among scholars is that these institutions have little basis in indigenous political culture, and have furthermore become breeding grounds of political corruption. This view has tended to elide anthropological analysis of internal chiefdom politics. However, it is argued in this article that such conclusions are premature. With reference to the Biriwa Limba chiefdom of northern Sierra Leone, it is shown that historical precedent, in many cases relating to prominent political figures of the late nineteenth century, continues to serve as a primary means of ordering local rights in land, settlement and political representation. This phenomenon is not a product of innate conservatism but emerges rather as a pragmatic response to the persistent failure of successive Sierra Leone administrations to extend modern measures of citizenship to the bulk of the rural populace. Rights and properties have become progressively localised in villages originally registered for tax collection in the early colonial era. Here one finds one of the most telling legacies of the British policy of indirect rule in post-colonial Sierra Leone.

INTRODUCTION

The chiefdoms of Sierra Leone were originally designed to harness `native authorities' to British colonial rule. They were inherited by the Sierra Leone Republic, and remain key institutions of local government. The longevity of these institutions has prompted much academic analysis. For example, political scientists have drawn attention to the paradoxical role of Paramount Chiefs as state agents commissioned to exercise `traditional' authority (Kilson, 1966; Barrows, 1976; Cartwright, 1978; Reno, 1995). They also reserve strong criticism for the Native Administration Scheme, introduced in legislation in 1937. The main aim of the scheme was to devolve the considerable economic and juridical powers formerly invested in Paramount Chiefs to a local assembly (Tribal Authority, later Chiefdom Council) directly representing, and funded by, local taxpayers (Kilson, 1966: 24-33; Clapham, 1976: 75-6; Barrows, 1976: 83-5). Yet little in practice was done to prevent Paramount Chiefs from continuing to collect payments for political and jural services, and appropriating tax revenue for private uses (Kilson, 1966: 53-68; Barrows, 1976: 98-142; Reno, 1995: 55-78).

It has been the avowed policy of successive governments of the Sierra Leone Republic to conserve the chiefdoms (Barrows, 1976: 98-142). All of Sierra Leone's parliamentary constituencies outside metropolitan areas follow chiefdom boundaries (Clarke, 1966). While all adult citizens are entitled to vote in parliamentary elections, many rural people remain unknown to the state except as chiefdom taxpayers and their dependants. Accordingly, government officials are reliant upon the Chiefdom Councils to supply them with the information necessary for compiling the electoral register, and parliamentary candidates are obliged to ally with local political factions in order to win votes. Furthermore, an amendment of 1972 to the Protectorate Land Ordinance of 1927 effectively left it to the Chiefdom Councils to determine the criteria of `native' status which confer chiefdom citizenship (Tuboku-Metzger and van der Laan, 1981: 30). These developments have provided Paramount Chiefs with renewed opportunities--and power--to act as political brokers (Kilson, 1966: 219-80; Minikin, 1973; Barrows, 1976: 143-242; Reno, 1995).

The apparent inertia of successive Sierra Leone administrations towards the reform of local government has prompted scholars to voice their own moral judgements. For example, Kilson (1966) saw the chiefdoms as anachronistic barriers to political modernisation. Reno (1995), writing in more pessimistic times, claims that the post-colonial era merely saw the extension of corrupt patrimonial politics to the higher echelons of government.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Locating the Politics of a Sierra Leonean Chiefdom
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?