Physician-Assisted Suicide

By Salem, Tania | The Hastings Center Report, May 1999 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Physician-Assisted Suicide

Salem, Tania, The Hastings Center Report

Promoting Autonomy--Or Medicalizing Suicide

Why have physician-assisted suicide and voluntary active euthanasia taken on such vitality in recent years? Some authors stress the conjunction of powerful medical and cultural trends. The advances of modern medicine in association with its overwhelming bias to treat have engendered widespread and increasing fear. More than death itself, what seems frightening is the very real prospect of losing control over one's own dying process.[1] The reaction to this exorbitant sway of medicine has been nourished since the 1970s: patients' empowerment or, more generally, the liberal individualism that has vigorously extended into the medical system. In response, advance directives, health care proxies, and other devices founded on the right to forgo medical treatment aim to "protect" patients from physicians, medicine, and hospitals' institutional imperatives. From the perspective of this recent history, physician-assisted suicide and even voluntary active euthanasia are just one more necessary and justified step in this process. It is as if what modern medicine has expropriated from individuals could be returned to them through physician-assisted suicide: control over their own deaths.[2]

These considerations condense two widespread current assumptions in the debate over aid in dying. The first is that these practices are, for better or for worse, paradigmatic expressions of patients' autonomy. Although proponents and opponents evaluate very differently the adequacy and the limits conferred to self-determination in this context, they both endorse this general assertion. The second assumption is that physician-assisted suicide and voluntary active euthanasia are ultimate brakes on the unrestrained use of medical technology at the end of life. They are instruments to promote the "demedicalization" of death.

I propose to challenge these assumptions. I want to argue that physician-assisted suicide does not demedicalize death; rather, it medicalizes suicide. By this I mean it transforms a private act (suicide) into a medical event. Indeed, physician-assisted suicide implies not a resistance to but an extension of medical power over life and death. And second, that instead of asserting an individual's autonomy physician-assisted suicide is in fact an impediment to it.

My analysis accepts the liberal/libertarian presumption that one of the essential attributes of the individual is precisely the liberty to govern oneself free from external constraints. Despite my belief in both the indispensability and inevitability of social constraints,[3] as an analytic device here I will assume radical autonomy to be a moral goal. I will also assume that from the perspective of the physician-patient dyad, more than killing, "assisted suicide" is literally what the phrase states: suicide with assistance, not only because it is the patient who makes the request, but also because it is she who is responsible for the final deed.

Promoting Autonomy, Demedicalizing Death

Many of those who favor physician-assisted suicide analyze and support it in reference to free choice, individual rights, and moral autonomy.[4] This line of argument rests on a conception of autonomy primarily as "negative liberty": the right to act and govern oneself in accordance with one's own private beliefs, values, and choices without interference as long as one's behavior does not harm others.[5] Proponents assert that this right should encompass patients' control over the timing and circumstances of death up to and including assistance in suicide. So conceived as a "personal and intimate decision," the right to aid in dying refers to a sphere of self-determination that should be left free from any paternalistic interference, whether that interference emanates from the state, from doctors, from family members, or from religious or philosophical orthodoxies. Physician-assisted suicide is, in short, advocated as a "natural" extension of the constitutionally protected "right to privacy," and as a mere specification of the moral right to self-determination.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Physician-Assisted Suicide


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?