Satellite Industry Ensnared

By Hackett, James | The Washington Times (Washington, DC), August 5, 1999 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Satellite Industry Ensnared


Hackett, James, The Washington Times (Washington, DC)


Today, the U.S. economy is the envy of the world. The unprecedented economic boom we are enjoying is driven by America's strong lead in information technologies. An important component of that lead is the U.S. space industry, which prospered as the revolution in information technologies created a growing global market for communication satellites.

American industry leads the world in satellite production, turning out 2 of every 3 satellites, worth more than $30 billion a year, with annual exports of $11.5 billion. But the United States does not have a monopoly. There are major competitors in Europe and growing competition in Asia, requiring U.S. companies to compete aggressively to hold their lead.

Yet, the Clinton administration is seriously damaging this booming U.S. industry to avoid annoying communist China. The administration was piqued last year when Congress passed legislation to tighten export controls on space technologies to prevent countries such as China from acquiring militarily useful technologies. Properly concerned about evidence of massive spying by mainland China that was later spelled out in the Cox Committee Report, Congress transferred export control responsibility for commercial satellites and their components from the list of exports managed by the Commerce Department to the munitions list handled by the State Department.

That put commercial communication satellites in the same category as arms, requiring close oversight and careful review before they can be exported. This is a wise precaution for satellites going to China, or any other country that is or may become hostile to the United States. But the Clinton administration does not want to distinguish between friendly countries and unfriendly ones. It continues to pursue a special relationship with the Beijing regime, as though Jiang Zemin were Winston Churchill.

What's more, the State Department is inadequately staffed to process satellite export licenses and has been slow to add staff despite congressional funding for that purpose. Export licenses, technical assistant agreements, and end use monitoring now are required even for satellites sold to or launched by our closest friends and allies, including NATO and Japan.

And there are delays and uncertainties. The State Department has no deadlines for processing export license requests, or for the related interagency clearance process. Foreign customers have no idea how long it will take to obtain approval to buy a satellite made in America.

Similar delays apply to the export of parts for foreign satellites, most of which include U.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Satellite Industry Ensnared
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?