Marital Power Relations, Resources and Gender Role Ideology: A Multivariate Model for Assessing Effects

By Kulik. Liat | Journal of Comparative Family Studies, Spring 1999 | Go to article overview

Marital Power Relations, Resources and Gender Role Ideology: A Multivariate Model for Assessing Effects


Kulik. Liat, Journal of Comparative Family Studies


Over the past 40 years, empirical research on marital power relations has been based on Resource Theory (Blood and Wolfe, 1960), an extension of the well-known Exchange Theory (Thibaut and Kelley, 1959). This popular approach to family power dynamics assumes that the partner with a resource advantage will also have a power advantage in the marital relationship. Empirical evidence has yielded partial support for this theory (Cromwell, Corrales and Torsiello, 1973, Fox, 1973, Kandel and Lesser, 1972; Katz and Peres, 1985), creating a need for continued development and modification (Rodman, 1967, 1972; Blumberg and Coleman, 1989; Dhruvarajan, 1992; Kingsbury and Scanzoni, 1989. Kranichfeld, 1987; Kulik and Bareli, in press; O'Connor, 1991).

One direction in which Resource Theory has been developed is the cultural context of the marital relation. According to Rodman (1967, 1972), power relations are affected both by norms regarding gender roles and by resources possessed by spouses. His studies in different countries revealed a relationship between normative social context and egalitarian (or non-egalitarian) marital relations. In Denmark, the United States, and Germany, for example, the wife's power advantage over her husband was stronger than in Greece and Yugoslavia, where social norms favor male dominance. Rodman assumed that this relationship held not only between countries, but also between traditional and modem sectors within the same modem society.

In addition to the direct relationship between gender role norms and marital power, Rodman argued that an indirect relationship exists, i.e., in traditional sectors with patriarchal values the impact of resources on marital power relations is limited. In these social contexts, the wife is expected to accept her husband's decisions even when she possesses considerable resources. In contrast, in modem sectors with relatively liberal gender role norms, there is a freer exchange between resources and decision making power in the marital relationship.

Based on this approach, it could be assumed that the impact of resources on marital power relations should be stronger in modem than in traditional contexts. This assumption, however, failed to be empirically substantiated in studies conducted in Mexico (Cromwell et al., 1973) and among Mormon students in the United States (Burr, Ahem and Knowles, 1977). Nor was it supported by an Israeli study (Katz, 1980), which in fact found higher correlations between resources and power in the traditional sector. These inconsistent findings indicate that the issue needs to be explored in greater depth.

The present study supplements existing research on marital power relations in different cultural contexts in several respects. Whereas previous studies have primarily addressed socioeconomic variables, the current research employs an integrative, multivariate model to assess the relative contributions of economic, social, health, psychological, and affective variables. Moreover, this study adds a future dimension to the explanation of family power dynamics. This dimension is expressed in the concept of anticipated dependence, i.e., the extent to which one spouse expects to become dependent on the other in the future in various areas of life. Thus, the model considers not only presently held power, but also anticipated power through future dependence. This is in keeping with research that considers the element of dependence a part of the power equation (Blau, 1964; Emerson, 1962). The inclusion of this dimension in the current model expands classic Resource Theory (which focuses on the exchange of accessible resources) by adding a potential resource that can affect current perceptions of power relations. The model is utilized to compare perceptions of elderly Israeli husbands who have relatively traditional gender-role ideologies with those who hold relatively liberal views.

An Integrative Model of Marital Power Relations

The current study makes use of an integrative model aimed at explaining attitudinal differences between "traditional" and "modern" husbands with regard to marital power relations. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Marital Power Relations, Resources and Gender Role Ideology: A Multivariate Model for Assessing Effects
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.