The Art of Confusing Explanation with Excuse

By Horn, Wade F. | The Washington Times (Washington, DC), August 17, 1999 | Go to article overview

The Art of Confusing Explanation with Excuse


Horn, Wade F., The Washington Times (Washington, DC)


So, Hillary Rodham Clinton believes the reason her husband has a taste for the ladies is that when he was very young, barely 4, he was "scarred by abuse" that occurred as a result of his being trapped between his mother and grandmother. Anyway, she adds, "he is a very, very good man." Why, she goes on to ask, should his little indiscretions "negate everything he has done as a husband, a father and a president?"

What's wrong with these statements is that they confuse explanation with excuse. Nowhere in Mrs. Clinton's now infamous interview in Talk magazine did she say her husband's adulterous behavior was reprehensible and that he should be held accountable for the consequences of that behavior. Instead, she merely asked us to understand why his behavior occurred.

When it comes to confusing explanation with excuse, Mrs. Clinton is not alone. Take, for example, the recent riots that occurred at Woodstock '99. Instead of condemning the behavior of the youths who went wild for nearly two days, not only burning the property of others, but raping at least a half-dozen women, the concert organizers urged us to understand the circumstances that led to the riotous behavior (the groups onstage, the high food prices, the hot weather, etc., etc., etc.).

The problem with confusing explanation with excuse is that it lets the perpetrator off the hook. If we can explain why a behavior occurred, the reasoning goes, we can't really hold the person accountable for that behavior, can we? In effect, we are asked to accept that the person didn't do it - the explanation did.

This line of thinking is endemic in much of modern psychology. While studying to become a psychologist, I came under the influence of several professors with a behaviorist bent.

If, these professors contended, we had perfect understanding of an individual's reinforcement history (that is, what kinds of rewards and punishments that individual has experienced in the past in response to a particular behavior), we would be able to predict perfectly the future behavior of the individual.

In other words, if a person commits some reprehensible behavior, it's not really his fault; his reinforcement history made him do it.

Freudian psychology says much the same thing, but with different language. Understand the person's early psychosexual history, many Freudians contend, and you will know all you need to know to understand current (adult) behavior. So, if that person commits adultery, he can't help it. His early psychosexual history made him do it.

Unfortunately, this kind of thinking is not confined to psychology. With the introduction of the social gospel at the end of the 19th century, individuals were no longer seen as responsible for such behaviors as drinking, drug use, debauchery or criminal activity. Rather, the social environment - poverty, overcrowding and the like - was to blame. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Art of Confusing Explanation with Excuse
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.