Holy Grail or Pandora's Box? : Evaluating Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research

By Lysaught, M. Therese | The World and I, November 1999 | Go to article overview

Holy Grail or Pandora's Box? : Evaluating Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research


Lysaught, M. Therese, The World and I


Research on human embryonic stem cells has numerous potential medical applications, but should it be pursued at the risk of imperiling our collective moral soul and social infrastructure?

Imagine yourself, 12 years from now, sitting in your doctor's office. The doctor has just informed you that you have a serious, debilitating disease. Treatment options are limited. Describing these options and following the canons of informed consent, your physician neutrally adds a caveat about one: the therapy is derived from human embryos. You must make a choice. What would you do?

A hypothetical scenario? Maybe not. Although floating in legal limbo and ensnared in an ethical quagmire, human embryonic stem (ES) cell research will most likely continue. Flourishing in the private sector, it may soon gain further momentum from an influx of federal money.

It has been a tumultuous 12 months since November 1998, when two research groups independently announced that they had achieved a major technical breakthrough: They had isolated human stem cells from embryonic tissues, cultivated the cells in laboratories for several months, and shown that these cells could develop into all three basic layers of cells in the human embryo. Because these cells, under the right conditions, can potentially "differentiate" (develop) into nearly every type of cell and tissue in the human body, they hold great promise for applications in medicine as well as for research into human development.

Hearing the news, the biological research community buzzed with excitement. Harold Varmus, director of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), was quoted as saying that human ES cell research "had the potential to revolutionize the practice of medicine and improve the quality and length of life." At the same time, ethical and moral critiques resounded. The central concern expressed was that the techniques by which the stem cells were derived involved the destruction of human embryos, depriving them of their potential to develop into full human beings. A related concern is whether this research would open one more door by which some might tinker with human life, possibly in some grand experiment in eugenics. Will the efforts at pursuing the holy grail of regenerative medicine open up a Pandora's box of undesirable moral and social consequences?

The quest

Interest in embryonic stem cells dates back to at least 1981, when they were first cultured successfully from mouse embryos. Since then, ES cells have been isolated from various other animals, including sheep, hamsters, pigs, cows, rabbits, mink, rhesus monkeys, and marmosets. But culturing human ES cells proved difficult: Once isolated, they refused to stay undifferentiated, seemingly driven to spontaneously differentiate and form primitive structures. The first publicly anowledged attempt to isolate and culture ES cells from human embryos in vitro was published in 1994. That attempt was unsuccessful.

Given these difficulties, biologists were especially impressed when, on November 6, 1998, James Thomson and his research team at the University of Wisconsin, Madison, reported in Science that they had successfully maintained human ES cells in laboratory culture for a number of months. The cells were derived from "spare," week-old embryos produced by in vitro fertilization at a fertility clinic, after obtaining consent from the gamete contributors. Thomson's group further showed that the ES cells could differentiate into a variety of tissue types--including the gut lining, muscle, cartilage, bone, and neural epithelium-- representing derivatives of all three basic layers of the mammalian embryo.

Four days later, the work of John Gearhart and his group at Johns Hopkins University was published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, announcing that they had isolated and grown similar stem cells in culture. Their work differed from Thomson's in two significant ways. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Holy Grail or Pandora's Box? : Evaluating Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.