The Georgetown Academy Is Not a `Foe' of Gay Rights
Thank you for the recent news coverage you have given ("Gays' critics accused of `hate speech,' " Oct. 27) and the recent column you printed ("Georgetown not `safe' for gay-rights foes," Oct. 29) regarding the plight of the Georgetown Academy, which saw its October issue destroyed for criticizing the "safe zone" program and other aspects of the administration of Georgetown University President Leo J. O'Donovan.
It is important that your readers, many of whom are alumni of America's colleges and universities or have children in those bulwark institutions, be informed as to what happens on today's campuses. Georgetown is but a microcosm example. Alumni and parents must participate intelligently and without co-optation in the future of their respective alma maters, because our nation's citizens and leaders come from these academic hilltops. As the environmentalists say every spring, "When the snow melts, we all live downstream."
I write, however, to correct two important aspects of your coverage. Your news article suggested that we at the Georgetown Academy opposed "safe zones" because they encourage "tolerance for homosexuals." Likewise, the headline of Tom Knott's column suggested that we are "foes" of gay rights. As your readers can see for themselves at www.georgetownonline.com, this portrayal of the Georgetown Academy's views is not accurate.
Questia, a part of Gale, Cengage Learning. www.questia.com
Publication information: Article title: The Georgetown Academy Is Not a `Foe' of Gay Rights. Contributors: Not available. Newspaper title: The Washington Times (Washington, DC). Publication date: November 5, 1998. Page number: 22. © 2009 The Washington Times LLC. COPYRIGHT 1998 Gale Group.
This material is protected by copyright and, with the exception of fair use, may not be further copied, distributed or transmitted in any form or by any means.