Supreme Court Justices Rank Highest in Credibility, Index Says: Talk Show Hosts, Athletes, Entertainers near the Bottom

By Harper, Jennifer | The Washington Times (Washington, DC), July 8, 1999 | Go to article overview

Supreme Court Justices Rank Highest in Credibility, Index Says: Talk Show Hosts, Athletes, Entertainers near the Bottom


Harper, Jennifer, The Washington Times (Washington, DC)


Reliability, plausibility, integrity: These are the traits that political strategists and marketing mavens dream of.

Combined, such virtues spell credibility, at least according to the National Credibility Index, which was released with little fanfare last month by the Public Relations Society of America (PRSA).

Based on several thousand in-depth interviews, this bold but quirky index rates a spectrum of public figures. Whom do we trust?

Supreme Court justices rank No. 1.

Amazingly, the index placed "famous athletes" near the bottom, surely a blow to General Mills, Nike and other companies that employ them as spokesmen.

And woe to those groups that use the wrong spokesman. Credibility fluctuates, the survey warned, and successful communication may be "due less to key messages than to the proper choice of the information source."

The athletes, however, outranked such public personas as political party leaders, PR specialists, entertainers and TV-radio talk show hosts, who ranked last.

"Measuring this reflects the dynamics of public opinion - that it is not captive to media pressure," said social scientist Ronald Hinckley, who supervised the survey.

His research team, which spent five years on the survey, found that credibility was rife with intangibles - a complex "amalgam" of issues, demographics, attitudes, peer influence, life experience, ideology and civic involvement.

The study listed 44 types of public figures; results were broken down along racial divides and according to issues like Social Security, race or foreign relations. The researchers gathered some 5,000 pages of material.

Little was dumbed down. There were no famous names mentioned in the study, only categories

The cachet of "celebrity" was missing, which perhaps explains why there was "little media follow-through," according to a PRSA spokesman Richard George, though many media organizations contacted the group last month.

"Some thought it was just too esoteric," he added.

The news media fared well in the survey, however, with reporters and news anchors outranking governors, senators, congressmen, mayors, the president, vice president and Cabinet members.

Overall, the survey found Americans to be inclined to give public figures "the benefit of the doubt." Americans also favor local rather than national figures.

But there is no such thing as a "universal authority" anymore. We pick and choose.

"Depending on the issue, Americans look to different people for guidance and information," said Joseph Curley, president of PRSA.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Supreme Court Justices Rank Highest in Credibility, Index Says: Talk Show Hosts, Athletes, Entertainers near the Bottom
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.