Toward a More Democratic Legislative Process.

The Washington Times (Washington, DC), January 24, 1999 | Go to article overview

Toward a More Democratic Legislative Process.


A host of issues face the Senate as members return to Washington for the 106th legislative session. While the fate of President Clinton, the future of Social Security and the changing face of our military hang in the balance, the Senate would be wise to take a long, hard look at its own future as well.

In the last few years, the Senate has embarked on a dangerous trend toward centralizing the lawmaking process in the hands of a small, elite group of senators, placing the integrity of our democratic process in peril.

Last October, in the waning days of the 105th session, member after member of the Senate strode to the floor to berate the process and means by which the body had concluded its business. Members found themselves outraged over the secretive nature in which a small triumvirate of leaders had negotiated the mammoth federal budget. And rightfully so. While power in the Senate has always relied on seniority; the power of Congress' elite few reached a new height last fall as final deliberations over the budget were relegated to an air-tight "war room" on Capitol Hill controlled by Senate Republican leader Trent Lott, House Speaker Newt Gingrich, their staffs, and the White House.

Conservative Nebraska Sen. Chuck Hagel's words were reflective of the Senate's general sentiment. "It will take months for us to study the more than 3,000 pages of text and learn what is in it. Yet we are asked to vote on this package, up or down, no amendments, with a couple of hours of debate. Take it or leave it. Mr President, that is irresponsible."

Sen. Robert Byrd of West Virginia, the Senate leader on matters of rules and tradition, declared the budget, "A creation, without a mother or a father, rather more like a Frankenstein creature, a being of some sort that has been patched together from old legislative body parts that do not quite fit. And just as Dr. Frankenstein was quite surprised by the results of his creation, so may we be startled by the result of ours."

Certainly, with a legislative branch based on open, democratic, and thoughtful deliberations, this is not what our Founding Fathers envisioned. Unfortunately, such an abomination of the democratic process is an all too familiar sight in today's United States Senate. Perhaps most damaging to the institution and the people it represents is the means by which the powerbrokers dictate their preferences during pivotal conference negotiations. After a bill has passed both the House and Senate (and assuming there are differences between the two versions), party leaders annoint a small number of conferees to work out the differences. Conference reports, which encompass the legislative compromise between competing House and Senate bills, are not open for amendment prior to final passage. As a result, new items added in the conference process avoid independent debate and scrutiny before being sent to the president.

With increasing boldness in recent years, party leaders have bucked their colleagues and inserted to the conference report unrelated, nongermane measures that were in neither the House or Senate bills.

Such an abhorrent practice is reserved for moments when leaders recognize that the measure would never withstand scrutiny. Until 1996, when the Senate overturned a prior precedent, inserting nongermane provisions during the conference process was prohibited by Rule 28 of the Senate's Standing Rules.

In 1997, without informing other conferees, Messrs. Lott and Gingrich inserted a provision in the Taxpayer Relief Act to allow tobacco companies to credit proceeds from a 15 cent cigarette tax increase against payments related to the tobacco industry settlement.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Toward a More Democratic Legislative Process.
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.