Chemical Weapons Moment of Truth

By Gaffney, Frank, Jr. | The Washington Times (Washington, DC), April 15, 1997 | Go to article overview

Chemical Weapons Moment of Truth


Gaffney, Frank, Jr., The Washington Times (Washington, DC)


There is a distinct possibility that the Republican-led Senate will cast some of the most important votes of the 105th Congress over the next two weeks.

Depending on the outcome, these votes may profoundly - and adversely - affect our nation's security, our businesses' competitiveness, the U.S. embargoes on Cuba and Iran and American constitutional rights. Irrespective of the outcome, however, they will be defining moments for the Republican Party.

The votes are expected to occur in connection with a Republican alternative to the increasingly controversial Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC) and on the resolution of ratification for the treaty itself. The most interesting aspect of this legislative drama arises from the fact that President Clinton is counting on a gaggle of primarily Bush administration officials to deliver the Republican senators needed to get the treaty ratified before April 29.

On the other side are the Reaganauts and some of the more robust members of the Bush administration, notably Cabinet officers Richard Cheney and Jack Kemp. Last week, this team argued powerfully against ratification of the CWC, and for an alternative offered by Sen. Jon Kyl on behalf of virtually the entire Senate Republican leadership. This alternative is known as the "Chemical and Biological Weapons Threat Reduction Act of 1997." It affords the Congress an opportunity to do something useful - through a unilateral and enforceable U.S. statute - to deal with the growing threat posed by such weapons at home and abroad, without embracing the false promise and immense costs of the Chemical Weapons Convention.

The quality of the opposition to this treaty is unprecedented. For example, never before have four former defense secretaries testified against a signed arms control agreement as James Schlesinger, Donald Rumsfeld, Caspar Weinberger and (in written form) Dick Cheney did last week. These sober, internationally minded Republicans of the Reagan School were joined in their opposition to the CWC before the Foreign Relations Committee by four other, estimable Reagan officials: U.N. Ambassador Jeane Kirkpatrick, Arms Control and Disarmament Agency Director Fred Ikle and top Defense Department officials Richard Perle and Douglas Feith.

Meanwhile, Mr. Cheney's Bush administration colleagues - notably, James Baker, Brent Scowcroft and Colin Powell - have the unenviable task of legitimating the likes of John Holum, the current occupant of Mr. Ikle's post at ACDA and a longtime aide to George McGovern, who has taken in these pages to dismissing as "rubbish" the sorts of concerns expressed by such credible Republican witnesses.

Last Thursday, Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott met with some 40 leading conservative activists representing a wide range of interests and millions of grass-roots constituents. They urged him to resist the Clinton-Bush gang's demands for hasty and favorable action on the Chemical Weapons Convention. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Chemical Weapons Moment of Truth
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.