State Dept. Revises Report on China's Arms Sales to Iran

By Scarborough, Rowan | The Washington Times (Washington, DC), April 15, 1997 | Go to article overview

State Dept. Revises Report on China's Arms Sales to Iran


Scarborough, Rowan, The Washington Times (Washington, DC)


The State Department changed written testimony submitted to a Senate panel last week in what critics say was an effort to downplay China's shipping of chemical weapons components to Iran.

The critics charge the Clinton administration is minimizing potential law violations in the China-Iran arms arrangement so it won't have to impose severe economic sanctions against Beijing.

Such action would risk ruining President Clinton's policy of engagement with the communist regime on the important issues of security in the Pacific and bilateral trade.

The testimony in question was given by Robert J. Einhorn, deputy assistant secretary of state for nonproliferation, to the Senate Government Affairs subcommittee on international security, proliferation and federal services.

Sen. Thad Cochran, Mississippi Republican and subcommittee chairman, called the hearing to get the administration's explanation for why sanctions have not been imposed. Mr. Cochran cited reports that China has sold nuclear-capable M-11 missiles to Pakistan, and chemical weapons components and cruise missiles to Iran, a designated terrorist state.

The State Department sent Mr. Einhorn's nine-page "for the record" statement a day before the hearing.

Regarding China's chemical sales, the statement said, "These dual-use chemical-related transfers to Iran's CW [chemical weapons] program indicate that, at a minimum, China's chemical export controls are not operating effectively enough to ensure compliance with China's prospective [Chemical Weapons Convention] obligation not to assist anyone in any way to acquire chemical weapons."

But a day later, the department asked to recall the testimony.

A second "official" statement deleted the phrase that said China is selling chemical components directly to Iran's weapons industry. Instead, it said, "These dual-use chemical-related transfers to Iran . . . "

The change was important, according to Senate staffers and nonproliferation experts.

"If they had stuck with the original testimony, there would have been practically no wiggle room on allowing China to avoid sanctions," said Gary Milhollin, director of the Washington-based Wisconsin Project on Nuclear Arms Control. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

State Dept. Revises Report on China's Arms Sales to Iran
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.