Casualties on the Civil Rights Battlefield

By Roberts, Paul Craig | The Washington Times (Washington, DC), May 25, 1997 | Go to article overview

Casualties on the Civil Rights Battlefield


Roberts, Paul Craig, The Washington Times (Washington, DC)


The U.S. Constitution forbids group rights. Disparate legal privileges are strictly unconstitutional. Moreover, they are strictly illegal under the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Yet, unconstitutional and illegal group rights have been in existence in our country since the 1970s. Moreover, the Clinton administration is proposing to both expand and codify with federal regulation the racial and ethnic categories that provide the basis for group rights. Indeed, group rights are expanding at such a speed that during the week of May 19 two separate congressional committees held hearings on the expansion of racial categories.

One might think Congress would use the hearings to inquire as to how the quota regime was created in defiance of both the Constitution and statutory law. But the Republicans are much too tame and timid to raise a fundamental issue. Instead, Congress accepts disparate legal privileges as a feature of the new American order and is debating only the extent to which the privileges are to be limited and the number of racial categories that will have privileged standing in the law.

On May 20, the Subcommittee on the Constitution of the House Judiciary Committee held hearings on the Justice Department's race rules for set asides in federal contracting. Under these rules, "preferred minorities," that is, groups arbitrarily defined as legally privileged by federal bureaucrats, are entitled to a proportionate share of federal contracts regardless of low bid.

To make certain that every "preferred minority" contractor is entitled to a set-aside, the regulations direct the Commerce Department to conduct "racial disparity studies" of 80 business sectors to affirm that minority contracting has been stymied by discrimination in the past. This finding will permit a proportionate share of federal contracts to continue be allocated by race instead of by low bid. This codification of legal privilege and disparate group rights by the U.S. Justice Department is being done in the name of "mending" affirmative action.

On May 22, a subcommittee of the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight held hearings to determine if the racial categories used in the U.S. Census need to be expanded. Obviously, more racial categories can be constructed than are presently in use. The larger the number of people who can be assigned privileged status, the fewer allies white males will have when they finally wake up and find that they are members of unprotected race and gender categories and, thereby, second-class citizens without equal rights. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Casualties on the Civil Rights Battlefield
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.