A Confederate General's Emancipation Attempt
Pruden, Wesley, The Washington Times (Washington, DC)
The might-have-beens are often the most fascinating speculations of history. What might the nation have been spared, even after the horror of a civil war, if Richmond had listened to a visionary Irishman?
Might the Rev. Jesse Jackson now be the national commander of the Sons of Confederate Veterans? Would Colin Powell be president of the Confederacy?
Improbable speculation, to be sure. But Pat Cleburne was an improbable Southerner, an even more improbable Confederate hero. But he was both. Cleburne only recently has begun to achieve his full measure of posthumous fame as "the Stonewall Jackson of the West" - a laurel he earned at Shiloh, Chickamauga, Ringgold Gap, Atlanta and finally the battle of Franklin outside Nashville, Tenn. He certainly might have become the Southern white man most honored by American blacks.
Cleburne's story is told in a new book, "Stonewall of the West," by Craig L. Symonds, a professor of history at the U.S. Naval Academy, and a fascinating story it is. This is a military analyst's book, but written in a style that makes Cleburne's story accessible to the layman.
Though Mr. Symonds traces and examines a remarkable military career with a scholar's skill, with all the heroics of battle and triumphs of command, the chapter on Cleburne's vain attempt at emancipation is particularly poignant in the context of today's supercharged racial sensibilities.
THE SLAVERY ISSUE
Late in 1863, with the South's prospects fraying, Cleburne wrote a "memorial" intended for the eyes of Jefferson Davis, proposing that slaves be granted their freedom on enlisting in the Confederate army. He could not have foreseen the anger he would arouse among certain colleagues.
Cleburne's letter was signed by 13 other senior officers, a tribute first to the heroics that had made him one of the most admired generals of the Confederacy.
Cleburne was aware, as Mr. Symonds writes, that the political issue of slavery had provoked the war, but in Cleburne's view, slavery was an issue, but not the principle, at stake. "I never owned a Negro," he wrote to his brother in Cincinnati early in the war, "and care nothing for them." Except for the New England abolitionists, this was as about as close as any white man, North or South, would come to expressing moral outrage over slavery. Lincoln, after all, was an unapologetic proponent of white supremacy, if not slavery, and so were most of his officers and soldiers as the war began.
THE NEED FOR MEN
Nevertheless, Cleburne misjudged the complicated issue of slavery in his adopted land. As a leader of men as well as one of the Confederacy's shrewdest tacticians, Cleburne was necessarily preoccupied with the arithmetic of the war. Confederate armies, as Mr. Symonds notes, routinely fought larger Union armies, and even when the Southerners won - which until Gettysburg was most of the time - the victories were more than the South ā¦
The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia
Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:
- Questia's entire collection
- Automatic bibliography creation
- More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
- Ad-free environment
Already a member? Log in now.
Questia, a part of Gale, Cengage Learning. www.questia.com
Publication information:
Article title: A Confederate General's Emancipation Attempt.
Contributors: Pruden, Wesley - Author.
Newspaper title: The Washington Times (Washington, DC).
Publication date: July 5, 1997.
Page number: 3.
© 2009 The Washington Times LLC.
COPYRIGHT 1997 Gale Group.
This material is protected by copyright and, with the exception of fair use, may not be further copied, distributed or transmitted in any form or by any means.
- Georgia
- Arial
- Times New Roman
- Verdana
- Courier/monospaced
Reset