Court Case Expands Protection against Defamation Suits

By Kopecki, Dawn | The Washington Times (Washington, DC), June 16, 1997 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Court Case Expands Protection against Defamation Suits


Kopecki, Dawn, The Washington Times (Washington, DC)


A federal judge's decision could bode well for nonprofits facing defamation lawsuits.

The Alexandria-based Community Associations Institute and its president, Barbara Byrd, recently won such a lawsuit levied by a former employee when a federal court in Virginia ruled that associations can - in some circumstances - make damaging statements that tarnish a person's professional reputation.

"It may significantly broaden the protection for association executives from defamation liability in certain circumstances. . . . It extends the scope of the `qualified privilege' protection for defamatory statements to include statements made to certain association members who do not serve on the board and may not even be committee members," said Jeffrey S. Tenenbaum, an association lawyer with Galland, Kharasch & Garfinkle in Washington.

The $1.25 million lawsuit stemmed from a letter Ms. Byrd wrote to at least two dozen CAI members regarding last year's termination of Debra Kaufman, the CAI's former head of education. The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia has sealed that letter. Ms. Byrd and other CAI workers discussed Ms. Kaufman's performance with others outside the association as well.

Qualified privilege basically allows a trade group to discuss sensitive issues with its board, as well as with a few others involved in running the association. Historically, it would not have covered a majority of the members who received the letter.

The ruling broadens those who fall under the qualified privilege by allowing the CAI to discuss Ms. Kaufman's firing with those who have an "interest" in the circumstances and to whom the association owes a "legal, moral or social duty to say the words," the court wrote.

"This is a wider net than has historically been cast in association cases involving the qualified privilege and should provide a fair degree of protection to association executives who choose to inform certain interested members why, for instance, a particular employee has been terminated," Mr. Tenenbaum said.

Ms. Kaufman has 30 days from the May 28 ruling to appeal the case, but she hasn't made that decision, said her attorney, Suzanne Tsintolas, who practices with the D.C. firm of Wright, Robinson, Osthimer & Tatum.

"It's a lot of money, a lot of time and a lot of emotional grief to go through one of these," said Bob Diamond, the CAI's immediate past president. "We wanted to go to the end to vindicate the association's reputation and [Ms. Byrd's] reputation."

The CAI works to educate professionals and consumers involved in homeowner or condominium associations.

NAME BLAME

Officials at the Greater Washington Society of Association Executives say they want to change the group's name to make it more marketable. But some members believe that the name change conceals a feud between the society and its national counterpart.

Officials at the GWSAE openly acknowledge that members often confuse it with its national organization, the American Society of Association Executives, or ASAE.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Court Case Expands Protection against Defamation Suits
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?