High Court Backs Asset Confiscation: Man's Indiscretion Cost Wife Her Car

By Murray, Frank J. | The Washington Times (Washington, DC), March 5, 1996 | Go to article overview

High Court Backs Asset Confiscation: Man's Indiscretion Cost Wife Her Car


Murray, Frank J., The Washington Times (Washington, DC)


A harlot who beds a client in a car, a plane, a ship or even a house may cost him more than the usual fee, the U.S. Supreme Court decided yesterday.

A 5-4 opinion authored by Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist and backed by both female justices rejected Tina Bennis' plea that fairness required she not forfeit her old clunker Pontiac to Detroit authorities because her husband used it for oral sex with a prostitute.

Innocence and fairness are beside the point, the chief justice said in the ruling, joined by Justices Sandra Day O'Connor, Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas and Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who relied on "a long and unbroken line of cases" for their decision.

But a withering dissent by Justice John Paul Stevens called it "blatant unfairness" that employed Middle Ages logic and ignored realities "simply because an illicit act took place once in the driver's seat."

"For centuries prostitutes have been plying their trade on other people's property. Assignations have occurred in palaces, luxury hotels, cruise ships, college dormitories, truck stops, back alleys and back seats," Justice Stevens wrote in his dissent, also signed by Justices David H. Souter and Stephen Breyer.

Reminding his brethren that Mrs. Bennis blamelessly allowed her husband to use the 1977 car to commute, Justice Stevens said no Supreme Court cases "would justify the confiscation of an ocean liner just because one of its passengers sinned while on board."

Justice Anthony M. Kennedy wrote a separate dissent.

Mrs. Bennis was described as confused and shocked by her attorney, Stefan B. Herpel of Ann Arbor, Mich., who ignored the absence of value in the car and brought the appeal in hopes of enhancing his status in the controversial field of civil forfeitures.

"The decision essentially relied on a medieval legal concept. I fear it has given police a tool for tyranny," Mr. Herpel said, calling the outcome shocking.

The Institute of Justice attacked the ruling as ignoring the rights of innocent property owners. While opposing Justice Thomas' vote, it praised the recommendation in his concurring opinion for changes in the law to correct the unfairness.

"We have learned in the past decade that if you give governments an inch under civil forfeiture laws, they will take a mile," said Institute of Justice attorney Scott Bullock, who claims such laws are roulette wheels for governments to raise money from the innocent.

The Detroit law sought to reduce offenses in high-crime zones by allowing police to seize and sell a car or other property used in prostitution, regardless of ownership. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

High Court Backs Asset Confiscation: Man's Indiscretion Cost Wife Her Car
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.