High Court Debates Limiting Death-Row Appeals: Queries Appellate Jurisdiction in Bill

By Murray, Frank J. | The Washington Times (Washington, DC), June 4, 1996 | Go to article overview

High Court Debates Limiting Death-Row Appeals: Queries Appellate Jurisdiction in Bill


Murray, Frank J., The Washington Times (Washington, DC)


The Supreme Court yesterday heard one of the most important challenges to its authority in two centuries but seemed torn between calls to speed executions and put new limits on its authority to hear death-row appeals.

The case centers on a new law that says a prisoner refused permission by a three-judge federal appeals panel to file a second or successive appeal - called petitions for writs of habeas corpus - may not appeal that decision.

When the argument ended, an outraged Sen. Orrin G. Hatch, Utah Republican and chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, criticized the Clinton administration's defense of a law he expected to stop decades of frivolous appeals.

"We have a president who claims he's tough on the death penalty, he's going to be tough on crime, and he sends the solicitor general up here who mealy-mouths the issue and tries to undermine the case," Mr. Hatch said on the Supreme Court steps.

The oral argument began moments after the high court unanimously decided another constitutional separation-of-powers case by ruling the president and commander in chief may define court-martial terms for condemning military murderers to death.

That decision removed a major roadblock to executing double-murderer Dwight J. Loving and seven other men on military death row at Fort Leavenworth by unanimously upholding sentencing procedures set out in 1984 by President Reagan.

The justices then turned to Congress' attempt, under the anti-terrorism bill that became law April 24, to restrict appeals rights that state prisoners were given in 1867.

Although they used Ellis Wayne Felker's appeal of his death sentence in Georgia for killing college student Joy Ludlum in 1981, the justices might have been appealing for themselves.

They devoted yesterday's argument solely to the one curbing court authority largely spelled out in the 1803 Marbury vs. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

High Court Debates Limiting Death-Row Appeals: Queries Appellate Jurisdiction in Bill
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.