Welfare Reformers: Stand and Deliver: Attention Turns to Best Ways to Provide Services

By Wetzstein, Cheryl | The Washington Times (Washington, DC), August 20, 1996 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Welfare Reformers: Stand and Deliver: Attention Turns to Best Ways to Provide Services


Wetzstein, Cheryl, The Washington Times (Washington, DC)


Welfare reform has passed Congress and President Clinton has promised to sign it into law, but already the next battle is beginning - over who can deliver welfare services.

While Democrats favor tax credits for higher education, Republican presidential candidate Bob Dole supports a tax credit for charitable gifts. His wife, Elizabeth, has said her goal as first lady would be to encourage all Americans to donate at least 1 percent of their incomes to a good cause.

At issue is the decades-old system in which professional nonprofit groups and some religious charities have received millions of dollars in government funding for services to the poor.

Groups that are deemed overly religious or that fail strict rules about staff credentials, program content or building standards are ineligible for government funding.

Republican leaders are trying to change that system, pointing to the successes of faith-based groups in helping troubled people improve their lives.

These reformers have won their first beachhead: The welfare reform bill Mr. Clinton has said he would sign invites states to use openly religious groups to serve the poor.

The welfare bill sets up protections for groups and recipients but tells states they can no longer reject a prospective provider just because it is faith-based.

This is the kind of shift many GOP leaders say they want to see.

"We're trying something new," said Sen. Daniel R. Coats, Indiana Republican. With Rep. John R. Kasich, Ohio Republican, Mr. Coats has introduced a package of 16 bills designed to "shift power, money and influence" from Washington to families, grass-roots groups, and private and religious charities.

Their efforts are buttressed by another bill, introduced by GOP Reps. James M. Talent of Missouri and J.C. Watts of Oklahoma, that would:

* Designate 100 communities to receive tax breaks and other kinds of financial "renewal."

* Establish educational-choice scholarship programs for poor families in renewal communities.

* Allow taxpayers to get tax credits (up to $200 for individuals, $400 for couples) if they give to charities that serve the poor.

* Allow faith-based groups to provide drug-treatment and counseling services.

The Talent-Watts bill was hailed by nearly 100 grass-roots groups at a July hearing held by two House subcommittees.

This bill is important, said Robert L. Woodson Sr., president of the National Center for Neighborhood Enterprise, "because it holds the promise of rescuing the poor from the suffocating grip of their saviors of the past 30 years."

These Republicans face formidable opposition from national coalitions of service providers and educational leaders who say that the proposed changes are unwise, reckless and unconstitutional.

More than 60 opposing groups, representing union workers, educational leaders, religious charities and professional social-service groups, rejected the Talent-Watts bill at the same hearing.

The Talent-Watts proposals "would come at a high price - the mandatory acceptance of the bill's radical policy agenda," Daniel E.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Welfare Reformers: Stand and Deliver: Attention Turns to Best Ways to Provide Services
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?