Federal Court Pulls Plug on Internet Decency Law: Ruling: Freedom of Speech Violated

By Abrahms, Doug | The Washington Times (Washington, DC), June 13, 1996 | Go to article overview

Federal Court Pulls Plug on Internet Decency Law: Ruling: Freedom of Speech Violated


Abrahms, Doug, The Washington Times (Washington, DC)


A special three-judge federal panel in Philadelphia yesterday struck down parts of a law intended to shield minors from smut on the Internet as an unconstitutional limit on free speech.

"Cutting through the acronyms and the argot, . . . the Internet may fairly be regarded as a never-ending worldwide conversation," U.S. District Judge Stewart Dalzell wrote for the court.

"The government may not, through the Communications Decency Act, interrupt that conversation," he wrote.

"As the most participatory form of mass speech yet developed, the Internet deserves the highest protection against governmental intrusion," the court said.

More than 50 groups, from the American Library Association to the American Civil Liberties Union to on-line interests, filed two lawsuits to block enforcement of the law. They welcomed the first major court decision defining the nature of the Internet's contents.

"The court today did for children and adults what Congress did not: It decided that parental-control tools combined with user education and enforcement of existing laws is a more effective and constitutional way to protect children and safeguard our freedom," said Bill Burrington, assistant general counsel for America Online Inc., which, with 6 million subscribers, is the nation's biggest on-line service.

President Clinton said in a statement released by the White House: "I remain convinced, as I was when I signed the bill, that our Constitution allows us to help parents by enforcing this act to prevent children from being exposed to objectionable material transmitted through computer networks."

He added that he strongly supports industry efforts to devise ways for parents and schools to filter what children see, as well as a system of content ratings.

The panel - Chief Judge Dolores Sloviter of the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, U.S. District Judge Ronald Buckwalter and Judge Dalzell - put out a two-page order and added 175 pages of opinions based on five days of hearings.

The judges did not topple provisions that make it a crime to post or send obscenity and child pornography, which are illegal in any form, where someone younger than 18 could see them.

But the law also prescribed criminal penalties as harsh as a $250,000 fine and two years in prison for displaying materials "patently offensive as measured by contemporary community standards."

Opponents said that provision threatened to put people in prison for posting information about sex education, AIDS, abortion or breast cancer or for displaying works of art where children could see them.

"The court has taken the ACLU line that anything goes on the Internet, even though that overlooks well-established laws protecting children from pornography in other areas," said Sen. Jim Exon, Nebraska Democrat and sponsor of the Internet decency bill. "Hopefully, reason and common sense will prevail in the Supreme Court."

The government may appeal the decision directly to the Supreme Court, a move the Justice Department said it will consider. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Federal Court Pulls Plug on Internet Decency Law: Ruling: Freedom of Speech Violated
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.