U.S. Loss at WTO Hits at Heart of Debate

By Woellert, Lorraine | The Washington Times (Washington, DC), January 20, 1996 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

U.S. Loss at WTO Hits at Heart of Debate


Woellert, Lorraine, The Washington Times (Washington, DC)


The World Trade Organization issued its first ruling this week, a well-timed stroke that cut to the heart of U.S. debate over free trade.

The substance of the ruling and its timing were remarkable - a fledgling international coalition challenging U.S. environmental laws at the outset of a presidential election year.

The decision, which went against the United States, has ignited a fierce rhetorical battle and could be a harbinger of things to come as international trade policies run headlong into U.S. environmental laws.

"The issue and the timing couldn't have been worse," said Clyde Prestowitz, president of the Economic Strategy Institute. "It goes right at the heart of the question of environment vs. trade, which we've been dancing around." Though the WTO decision ultimately may not have any concrete effect on actual standards for gasoline purity - the subject of its ruling - it could have resounding political ramifications.

Republican presidential candidate Pat Buchanan already has called for the United States to withdraw from the WTO and has promised to make its "assault" on U.S. sovereignty a campaign issue.

"I think environmental regulations have become too onerous, extensive and extreme, however they were made by Americans," Mr. Buchanan said. "We are not going to surrender our right to make our own laws to some foreign organization where we have no veto power, where we can be outvoted by Barbados."

He's part of an unusual alliance that includes environmental groups such as Ralph Nader's Public Citizen, which says U.S. trade policies threaten to undermine progress on cleaning the environment.

The opposition group is countered by centrists in Congress and many economists, who say international cooperation makes good economic sense and eventually will compel U.S. trading partners to rise to tougher U.S. environmental standards.

"We set up this process," said Rep. Jim Kolbe, Arizona Republican, who called the WTO ruling "an open-and-shut case" against the United States.

Ultimately the United States will win more than it loses, Mr. Kolbe said. But he and others fear the timing and content of the WTO ruling could lead to a dismantling of agreements that have taken decades to establish.

Trade protectionists such as Mr. Buchanan, Mr. Kolbe said, "always forget the consumer in this. The consumers have more choices and lower prices; they benefit."

The WTO ruling, made by a panel of three jurists and announced Wednesday, favored Venezuela and Brazil, which had challenged U.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

U.S. Loss at WTO Hits at Heart of Debate
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?