Foreign Aid Vote in House Today to Turn on Abortion: Pro-Lifers Seek to Limit Definition of `Family Planning'

By Roman, Nancy E. | The Washington Times (Washington, DC), February 13, 1997 | Go to article overview

Foreign Aid Vote in House Today to Turn on Abortion: Pro-Lifers Seek to Limit Definition of `Family Planning'


Roman, Nancy E., The Washington Times (Washington, DC)


Abortion gets its first test in the House today when members vote on millions of dollars in federal money for international family planning.

Although it began as a foreign aid vote, the House will decide when to release the money and whether to further restrict those funds.

"This is about whether U.S. tax dollars should go to finance abortion abroad," said Rep. Christopher H. Smith, who pushed GOP leaders for a chance to consider whether organizations that lobby to overturn anti-abortion laws can receive federal funds for family planning.

Victoria Markell, vice president and director of political affairs of Population Action International, said Mr. Smith and his supporters are playing a game.

"This is a political gimmick on the part of the Christian Coalition and the National Right to Life Committee," she said. "There is a reason why women are leaving the Republican Party in droves."

The House will vote first on the Clinton resolution, which would release about $30 million per month for family planning beginning on March 1 - an additional $123 million over four months. There would be no additional restrictions on how family-planning groups spend that money.

Members will then vote on a resolution offered by Mr. Smith that would release $385 million for family planning on March 1 as long as none of the money goes to organizations that perform abortions or to groups that lobby to overturn anti-abortion laws.

The United States spends about $400 million a year - about 25 percent of the development budget - on programs for population control in foreign countries. Federal law already precludes family-planning organizations from spending U.S. money on abortion services. Family-planning groups that devote resources to education and contraception would not be affected.

The effect of the Smith resolution would be to deny federal funding to two of about 380 family-planning groups internationally - the Planned Parenthood Federation of America and the International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF) of London, which works with 140 family-planning affiliates in other countries.

"The money we provide them makes them more powerful and more effective in effectuating their abortion agenda," he said.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Foreign Aid Vote in House Today to Turn on Abortion: Pro-Lifers Seek to Limit Definition of `Family Planning'
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.