Ideology or Partisanship for the GOP?

By Pascoe, Bill | The Washington Times (Washington, DC), January 24, 1997 | Go to article overview

Ideology or Partisanship for the GOP?


Pascoe, Bill, The Washington Times (Washington, DC)


Ideology, or partisanship? Which is more important for Republicans trying to win elections? For those concerned with such deep thoughts, last Friday was a day to behold. Within a span of just a few hours, three events occurred that signaled the supremacy of one vision and the failure of the other: at the White House, Robert J. Dole was awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom; on Capitol Hill, Speaker Newt Gingrich's ethics case was argued before the House Ethics Committee; and uptown, at the Renaissance Hotel, a new chairman of the Republican National Committee was elected to replace Haley Barbour.

These unrelated events highlighted the three different wings of the Republican Party - the presidential wing, the congressional wing, and the state and local wing - and their conflicting answers to the question stated above. The presidential wing has taken the view in the last two elections that simple partisanship is enough, and has failed; the congressional and state and local wings have taken the view that ideology is paramount, and have achieved historic successes.

To begin, Mr. Dole's award. Mr. Dole represents both the best and the worst of the Republican Party at the presidential level: the best, in that truly no man loves his country, and made more sacrifices for it, than he. But at the same time, he represents the worst of the GOP: the stoic, harsh image; the near-obsession with balancing budgets at the cost of all else (even if it means increasing taxes on a regular basis); the fuzziness about ideology and "the vision thing."

Mr. Dole's Republican Party was a party that offered only a cheaper version of the Democratic vision of bigger government, and one that would be paid for as we go along, thank you very much. It was a party that felt uncomfortable talking about the things that win elections - the social issues. And it was a party that lost the last two presidential elections.

On Capitol Hill, meanwhile, we were hearing the full charges against Mr. Gingrich. While the controversy over whether he took liberties with arcane tax laws (and his resulting fine) will attract the most attention, what was most significant about Friday's hearing was the defense offered by his counsel, Randy Evans, who gave a detailed explanation of the difference between the Party and "the [conservative] movement."

Critics of the Speaker, Mr. Evans stated, fundamentally misunderstand the nature of what the Speaker was doing in the early part of this decade. They focus on what they believe to be the use of tax-exempt charitable organizations to further a partisan goal - when in reality, he pointed out, it was precisely the other way around: the Speaker intended to use partisan organizations to achieve the supremacy of the movement and its ideological vision. Using charitable foundations was not a means to achieve a desired partisan end, to wit, Republican victory; rather, a Republican victory was the means to achieve the desired ideological end, to wit, conservative dominance over the intellectual and political life of the nation.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Ideology or Partisanship for the GOP?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.