Animal-Rights Groups Win Ruling in Lab-Manual Rewrites

By Murray, Frank J. | The Washington Times (Washington, DC), January 17, 1997 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Animal-Rights Groups Win Ruling in Lab-Manual Rewrites

Murray, Frank J., The Washington Times (Washington, DC)

In an extraordinary reversal, a conservative D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals panel has ruled that animal-rights groups must have access when the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) writes "the bible of lab-animal care."

The NAS manual on handling animals in laboratory research is mandatory for all research financed by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and is used for reference worldwide.

Valerie Stanley, an attorney for the Animal Legal Defense Fund (ALDF), which brought the case, yesterday said the decision is a crack in the door to expose research practices to public examination, but not much more.

"The likelihood that animals are not going to be used in research as a result of this decision is far-fetched," she said, characterizing the NAS manual as the industry bible. "It's going to air the issues. It's going to let the sun shine in."

NAS spokeswoman Susan Turner-Lowe said the 133-year-old science group hasn't decided whether to appeal. She defended the value of secrecy she said has been the NAS rule since 1916.

"It is an attempt to get at the scientific basis of a problem without undue influence, to conduct deliberative processes in a careful and privileged manner," Mrs. Turner-Lowe said.

While the activists' courtroom victory over Donna E. Shalala, secretary of health and human services, and the NAS appears to assure future access by opponents of animal testing, it came a bit late for their stated objective.

ALDF had sought to block publication of the seventh edition of the "Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals," but it came out a year ago, while the group was on the losing end of lower court decisions.

The unanimous opinion written by Circuit Judge Laurence H. Silberman ordered District Judge Gladys Kessler to decide whether to enjoin NAS and its National Research Council from acting behind closed doors and which documents must be disclosed.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Animal-Rights Groups Win Ruling in Lab-Manual Rewrites


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?