Service Chiefs Fear for Missile Defenses: Deal with Russia Could Blunt U.S. Edge, General Says

By Gertz, Bill | The Washington Times (Washington, DC), March 10, 1997 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Service Chiefs Fear for Missile Defenses: Deal with Russia Could Blunt U.S. Edge, General Says


Gertz, Bill, The Washington Times (Washington, DC)


Gen. Ronald Fogleman, the Air Force chief of staff, says the military service chiefs are worried that an agreement being negotiated with Russia could impose harmful restrictions on future U.S. missile defenses as part of a side agreement to a U.S.-Russian defense treaty.

"All the chiefs have great concerns about this," Gen. Fogleman told The Washington Times. "I would hate to see us negotiate away any kind of advantage we might have in space-based sensors, or in the airborne laser or anything like that."

Two senior State Department officials held talks in Moscow last week about concessions the Russians are seeking on U.S. regional missile defenses that would pave the way for a side agreement expanding the terms of the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile treaty to cover short-range missile defenses, Clinton administration officials said.

The ABM treaty limits strategic defenses against long-range missiles. The Clinton administration has been trying to expand the pact in contentious talks with Russia for the past four years.

Deputy Secretary of State Strobe Talbott arrived in Moscow Thusrday to join up with Undersecretary of State Lynn Davis. They held pre-summit talks with Russian officials focusing on expansion of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, arms control issues related to the Russian ratification of the START II treaty, changes to the Conventional Forces in Europe treaty and the so-called ABM theater missile defense demarcation accord, said officials who spoke on condition of anonymity.

The U.S. delegation returned Friday, but a State Department official said everything discussed is being kept secret.

Gen. Fogelman said in an interview before the talks that the service chiefs have "parochial concerns" that the agreement will restrict individual systems. Navy officials worry it could end up restricting the ship-based "theaterwide" regional missile defense, and the Army is concerned about limits on the speed of anti-missile interceptors that could hamper Army defenses now under development, he said aboard his C-20 jet en route from Florida to Washington.

Asked why there is an apparent administration rush to expand the ABM treaty, even though several future regional defense systems have been declared in compliance with the pact, Gen. Fogelman said: "Quite frankly, in all the discussions that the chiefs have had, the greater concern is just that.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Service Chiefs Fear for Missile Defenses: Deal with Russia Could Blunt U.S. Edge, General Says
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?