High Court Rebukes Federal Judges for Flouting Federalism

By Murray, Frank J. | The Washington Times (Washington, DC), March 4, 1997 | Go to article overview

High Court Rebukes Federal Judges for Flouting Federalism


Murray, Frank J., The Washington Times (Washington, DC)


The Supreme Court roundly castigated federal judges yesterday for disrespecting federalism by wasting 4 1/2 years considering an Arizona voter initiative that forces state workers to speak English on the job.

The unanimous high court said the Arizona Supreme Court should decide what that 1988 state law means and said the federal case became "moot," or legally academic, in 1990 when the plaintiff resigned her state job.

"Federal courts lack competence to rule definitively on the meaning of state legislation," Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote in a ringing declaration.

"Respect for the place of the states in our federal system calls for close consideration of that core question" of whether a constitutional challenge is needed, she wrote in vacating orders of the U.S. District Court in Arizona and the 9th U.S. Circuit Court declaring the English-only law unconstitutional.

"The Ninth Circuit, in the case at hand, lost sight of these limitations," the high court declared in a blunt criticism of a circuit court that it reverses unusually often. So far this term the high court overturned 10 of the 11 9th Circuit cases it has decided.

That the 37-page decision did more than dismiss the case for mootness delighted states' rights advocates who say such an approach may blunt other constitutional attacks, including the pending challenge to California's Proposition 209 limiting affirmative action in contracting and public jobs.

"That part is good. We have a federalism argument, an abstention argument, on 209," said Anne M. Hawkins, attorney for the Pacific Legal Foundation, which is involved in both cases.

"It could allow a state court to determine the meaning of 209. Having said that, I don't know if the 9th Circuit is going to toe the line more than they have done in any other case," Miss Hawkins said.

Although yesterday's action technically reinstates the ban on speaking any language but English in most state offices, it appears to be still blocked from enforcement by an Arizona Supreme Court stay. That court is deciding a separate challenge that Justice Ginsburg said will clarify its impact.

"Once the Arizona high court has addressed the question - just what does Article 28 mean? - the resolution of any remaining federal constitutional question may be greatly simplified," Justice Ginsburg said in announcing the opinion from the bench. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

High Court Rebukes Federal Judges for Flouting Federalism
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.