Why Feminism and Fidel Don't Mix

By Beichman, Arnold | The Washington Times (Washington, DC), December 17, 1996 | Go to article overview

Why Feminism and Fidel Don't Mix


Beichman, Arnold, The Washington Times (Washington, DC)


Back in the 1970s when I was teaching political science at the University of Massachusetts, there were two ultra-left members in my department, both women. For them, Fidel Castro was the greatest revolutionary humanist after Lenin. They would blather on about Fidel at any opportunity with the kind of worshipful affection which in their adolescence they probably had once dedicated to Frank Sinatra.

As anybody who has ever been in academia knows (and if you haven't been, take my word for it), departmental meetings are more boring than replays of Bob Dole's campaign speeches. And it was at these weekly meetings that the two Fidel groupies would make their pitch for special courses, special seminars and intensive research on the new socialist Cuba so that students would learn about the wonderful achievements of Fidelismo.

There was no point in arguing about Cuba with my two colleagues, who were also dyed-in-the-wool feminists. After all, arguing would merely prolong the departmental meeting and cut into our lunch hour. Finally a day came when I could stand it no longer. One of the two women professors started talking about the marvels of the new socialist Cuba and how the Cuban people had benefitted from the communist revolution, I blurted out: "As feminists, how can you say that? Show me how Cuban women have benefitted from the revolution? Can you, as feminists, point to a single gain specifically by Cuban women? Can you give me the name of a single woman who sits on the Politburo, in the junta, or who holds any important office in Cuba?"

I don't remember their reaction but obviously as feminists and socialists, they couldn't have found any data-laden affirmative answers to my questions. No matter what the party propaganda may intone, socialist dictatorships are a principled enemy of feminism just as they are enemies of any private organization, like labor unions or church groups, which seek autonomy from party rule.

For example, the Soviet Union promulgated codes of family law which proclaimed total equality between men and women. But, as co-authors Heller and Nekrich wrote in "Utopia in Power," "legal equality in all fields . . . and the verbal assurances of free access for women to all jobs and professions, was not backed up by economic and social conditions guaranteeing real equality." Francine du Plessix Gray wrote a devastating report on the tribulations of Soviet women, in the New Yorker, February 19, 1990. Eastern Europe's satellized socialist dictatorships also ignored women's rights.

Somehow while the United States has been subjected to censorious examination by women political scientists and women's organizations, Cuba has escaped this kind of focused attack. It is rare to find in scholarly journals a documented critique about the treatment of one-half of the Cuban population.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Why Feminism and Fidel Don't Mix
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.