Q: Is the Use of Student Fees for Political Activism Constitutional?

By Wood, David; Sears, Alan E. | Insight on the News, October 18, 1999 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Q: Is the Use of Student Fees for Political Activism Constitutional?


Wood, David, Sears, Alan E., Insight on the News


Yes: Opponents of the current system simply seek to silence the voices of those with whom they disagree.

BY DAVID WOOD

The U.S. Supreme Court characterizes our colleges and universities uniquely as "the marketplace of ideas." The allies of the plaintiffs in the Southworth vs. the University of Wisconsin case intend nothing less than the restraint of trade in the free market of ideas that animates the daily life of our colleges and universities. When their ideas fail to carry the day at a public institution such as the University of Wisconsin at Madison, they seek refuge in judicial micromanagement of collegiate affairs.

Draped in the heady words of James Madison and Thomas Jefferson, they allege tyranny where most people see an open forum, compelled association where others celebrate debate and opportunities for educational exchange, and ideological one-sidedness in the midst of representative democracy.

Most courts have rebuked attempts by off-campus interests to silence student speech, association and activities. With very few exceptions, our court system has recognized the important role universities serve in our society and the critical importance of broad educational experiences to fulfilling that role.

We would be poorer as a nation if student speech and activism were not part and parcel of the university experience. We would be heavy-handed and patronizing if students were not permitted to organize collectively to determine what is in their best interests. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin vs. Southworth, et al. is the latest in a line of cases challenging the use of mandatory student fees to fund a range of activities, including activities which may be described as political or ideological. In these cases, student plaintiffs allege that by imposing a mandatory fee to support student organizations with which the objecting students disagree, the university violates the students' First Amendment rights.

What is unique about the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals' decision in Southworth, however, is that it is the only federal appellate court decision to strike down as unconstitutional the use of a mandatory general-activity fee to support a forum for campus speech.

The 7th Circuit's decision is not compelled by, but is in fact inimical to, the First Amendment. The core purpose of the First Amendment is to protect and nurture free expression, not to stifle it. Nothing in the First Amendment forbids state colleges and universities from creating a forum for student groups to engage in robust and spirited debate on any subject, especially political or ideological issues, so long as the university does not discriminate on the basis of a group's viewpoint. The 7th Circuit's view of the First Amendment would transform state university campuses into sterile ivory towers with student groups, newspapers and speakers' bureaus subject to strict censorship rules to ensure that they steer clear of "ideological" issues.

Let's retreat momentarily for a slice of context. The four most recent cases alleging compelled association through student fees -- arising from the University of Oregon, Lane (Ore.) Community College, the University of Wisconsin at Madison and the University of Minnesota -- share many similarities. Each is supported by or brought at the behest of off-campus institutions whose agendas transcend the parochial politics of campus activities -- for example, the Pacific Legal Foundation and the Alliance Defense Fund. Each complains of the receipt of student fees by so-called ideologically liberal organizations operated by students, representing a range of educational, cultural, social and/or political issues.

Each is fronted by one or more plaintiffs who, as students, tried unsuccessfully through student government or campus elections to eliminate activity-fee funding for the organizations they oppose.

The details of each campus-funding mechanism differ.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Q: Is the Use of Student Fees for Political Activism Constitutional?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.