Contested Ethnicities and Ancient Homelands in Northeast Chinese Archaeology: The Case of Koguryo and Puyo Archaeology

By Pak, Yangjin | Antiquity, September 1999 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Contested Ethnicities and Ancient Homelands in Northeast Chinese Archaeology: The Case of Koguryo and Puyo Archaeology


Pak, Yangjin, Antiquity


Introduction

In many countries of east Asia, archaeological knowledge is frequently used in the construction of ethnic histories, and the discipline of archaeology is often employed to emphasize ethnic and cultural identities (Fawcett 1995; Nelson 1995). It is thus important for archaeological research in this region to understand how archaeological knowledge is used in each country to establish national identity, to promote national solidarity, to delineate various ethnic groups and to proclaim ancestral territories, cultural antiquity and unbroken cultural and ethnic continuity.

In the case of Koguryo (Gaogouli in Chinese pronunciation) and Puyo (Fuyu) Archaeology, the situation is very much complicated because of the nature of the historical background and ethnic affiliation of these two societies. According to Chinese historical records, Puyo emerged in the region of the Songhua River basin in northeast China as early as the 3rd century BC. About the same time, a predecessor of Koguryo consolidated its strength in the Hun River basin and the middle Apnok (Yalu in Chinese) River valley. Sometime after the beginning of the Common Era, the Koguryo and Puyo societies arose to become states in each corresponding area, both currently in Northeast China.

Since these ancient societies are usually attributed to the ancestors of modern Koreans by both Chinese and Korean scholars, the archaeological and historical studies have been affected, not only by scholarly concerns, but also by contemporary political and social circumstances of China, North Korea and South Korea. Factors such as national pride and sovereignty, political ideology and the social and cultural environments of China and both Koreas have greatly influenced scholarly interpretation as well as public images of these societies.

Early Chinese historical records

In many early Chinese historical records, both Koguryo and Puyo are described in the 'accounts' of the so-called 'Eastern Barbarians'. One of the most comprehensive descriptions of these early societies is called 'Accounts of Eastern Barbarians' and is part of Sanguozhi, or 'Annals of the Three States' (Wei, Shu and Wu; AD 220265), that was compiled in the second half of the 3rd century AD. It describes Koguryo and Puyo as well as the societies of Upru (Yilou in Chinese), East Okcho (Woju), Ye (Hui), Samhan (Sanhan) and Wae (Wo; or Wa in Japanese). The geographical location of these societies, as well as ethnic and cultural similarities among them, seems to have been the major reason why they were placed together and described in one chapter.

The same structure was also employed in Hou Hanshu, or 'Records of Later Han' (AD 25220), that was compiled in the mid 5th century. According to these historical records, Koguryo and Puyo were more closely related to each other in terms of ethnicity and linguistics than either was to any of the other groups. In the historical records of later Northern and Southern Dynasties, most of these groups disappeared. Three Kingdoms of Koguryo (37 BC (traditionally)-AD 668), Paekche (18 BC (traditionally)-AD 660) and Shilla (57 BC (traditionally)-AD 936) were the titles used to describe the political and social circumstances of Northeast China and the Korean Peninsula.

Chinese policy

Most of the archaeological ruins of the Koguryo and all of the Puyo are now located within the Liaoning and Jilin provinces of the People's Republic of China. In addition to these two ethnic groups, Korean scholars have paid much attention to research on Kochoson (2333 (traditionally)-108 BC), which is believed to have occupied part of Northeast China, and Parhae (AD 698-926), the centre of which was located in Heilongjiang Province of China. While modern Koreans consider all these ethnic groups as their forebears, the Chinese government regards the archaeological sites and remains of these societies as the heritage of the so-called 'ethnic minorities', the descendants of whom are still living in northeast China under Chinese jurisdiction.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Contested Ethnicities and Ancient Homelands in Northeast Chinese Archaeology: The Case of Koguryo and Puyo Archaeology
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?