The Role of Offshore Jurisdictions in the Development of the International Trust

By Brownbill, David | Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, October 1999 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

The Role of Offshore Jurisdictions in the Development of the International Trust


Brownbill, David, Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law


I. INTRODUCTION

The past twenty years have seen a vast amount of legislative activity on trust law in various offshore countries. Several countries--Belize, Dominica, Guernsey, Jersey, St. Vincent and the Grenadines, the Turks and Caicos Islands, and Samoa among them, while not formally codifying trust law, have adopted complete trust statutes offering a more or less comprehensive body of modern laws addressing all aspects of the trust relationship.(1)

Since the early 1960s, numerous other countries such as the Bahamas, Bermuda, the Cayman Islands, the Isle of Man, the British Virgin Islands, and Gibraltar have seen the steady adoption of England's Trustee Act 1925 with important variations. Several have also enacted the equivalent of England's Variation of Trusts Act 1958 and a smaller group has enacted the Trustee Investments Act 1961 and the Perpetuities and Accumulations Act 1964.(2) In the past ten or so years, these countries have adopted a highly targeted approach through the introduction of special legislation addressing specific issues, such as conflict of laws, fraudulent dispositions, purpose trusts, and perpetuities.(3)

This legislation creates a number of difficult policy issues and raises a host of technical challenges to many traditional or accepted constructs of trust law.

II. POLICY

The objects of offshore jurisdictions in promulgating modern trust laws are quite different than those that most onshore countries have had in mind when enacting more traditional trust legislation. Whereas statutory developments in the onshore jurisdictions are almost always a response to the needs of domestic users of trusts, offshore legislation has little or nothing to do with domestic needs. The primary, if not sole purpose of the legislation is to create or enhance international trust business in the particular country. Therefore, the political context of the legislation is quite the reverse of that in most onshore countries. Historically, the difficulty faced by reformers in securing any political interest in their legislative proposals and the necessary parliamentary time for their enactment have been major impediments to the development of the law in most onshore jurisdictions.

There tends not to be such difficulty in the offshore jurisdictions. The starting point is a combination of private sector pressure to enhance business opportunities and governmental desire to enhance employment and increase revenues. In such an environment, trust legislation will be high on the political agenda. At the same time, there is in most offshore centers relatively little domestic trust activity, so the need to protect the interests of beneficiaries under wholly domestic trusts will be minimal. Thus, not only will there be pressure for the legislation, but there will also be little if anything militating against it. Several jurisdictions have, in any case, adopted a "ring fencing" policy restricting the application of the new legislation. For example, see Bermuda's purpose trust law,(4) the Cayman Islands' STAR trusts legislation,(5) and Jersey's statutory trust law,(6) all of which exclude trusts of land situated in their respective countries. In addition, several statutes establish a creature known as the "international trust" to which is accorded all the benefits of the modern statute but from which residents or nationals of the country in question are excluded.(7) Even in these instances, the exclusion is more likely to reflect a desire to preserve a limited land supply or the local tax base rather than to protect local trusteeships.

Policy issues raised by modern offshore legislation extend well beyond the single question of economics. There is, on the one hand, the morality of some of the highly targeted "product" legislation and, on the other hand, the wider question of the proper employment of sovereign power. There can be no question that legislation that extends trust law to assist persons outside the jurisdiction to sidestep what would otherwise be a binding law raises difficult moral and comity issues.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

The Role of Offshore Jurisdictions in the Development of the International Trust
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?