When Debt Write-Off Is Not Relief

By De Giorgio, Emmanuelle Moors | African Business, November 1999 | Go to article overview

When Debt Write-Off Is Not Relief


De Giorgio, Emmanuelle Moors, African Business


On 18 September, the Mozambique Debt Group, a coalition of NGOs and individuals campaigning on the country's foreign debt, led a street demonstration that called for a total write-off of the money owed by Mozambique to its external creditors.

Ironically, this demonstration occurred less than three months after the World Bank and the IMF announced in great pomp that Mozambique was to receive close to $3.7bn in debt relief under the Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (HIPC) initiative (worth $1.7bn in net present value terms).

Despite the large sums involved, debt relief campaigners are not satisfied with the scale of the relief. Are they simply tugging further on the rope or is there some truth to their claim that the debt relief package is insufficient?

Let's examine the situation.

For a start, and partly to reflect the commitments taken by the G-7 following the Cologne 19 June summit, the present value of the debt relief package finally agreed for Mozambique was raised by around $300m over the amount originally committed. This is also the largest debt relief operation organised so far by the international community under the HIPC initiative.

While this is all fine and dandy, what is the impact of the debt relief package on Mozambique's Balance of Payments? According to the World Bank, "Mozambique's external debt-service obligations will fall to an annual average of $73m in 1999-2005, compared with an average of $169m that would have been due in the absence of HIPC initiative relief". However, a more significant comparison is with the amount actually paid by Mozambique. Between 19951998, Mozambique paid an average of $114m per year in debt service, thus the actual saving from the debt relief package is $41m per year.

On the positive side, observed Joseph Hanlon, policy adviser to the Jubilee 2000 coalition, which has relentlessly campaigned for the cancellation of the external debt of the poorest countries, "this is compared to the $13m saving that had been predicted by the IMF and the World Bank when the decision was made to grant debt relief in April last year."

But he reckons that the unexpected gain for Mozambique comes from three causes. First, donors had decided that the ratio of the present value of the external debt divided by the annual exports of goods and services should be 200%. With declining interest rates pushing up present values and export projections for Mozambique revised downwards, a larger amount of debt than planned had to be written off in order to maintain this ratio of 200%. One should note here that the Cologne debt initiative actually proposed a ratio of less than 150% and that this new ratio was approved at the September meetings of the World Bank and the IMF, paving the way for potentially more debt relief. Interestingly, Hanlon remarks that a ratio of less than 150% was also deemed sustainable by the World Bank before the HIPC relief initiatives were first established, but that the benchmark was later increased because "they felt otherwise it would be too expensive." In this regard, noted Oxfam a couple of years ago, "the ratios are based on the experience of much wealthier Latin American countries in the 1980s. Compared to the HIPC countries, the indebted Latin American countries had diversified exports, strong manufacturing bases and more skilled work forces. There is no evidence that their experience is relevant for poor, war torn economies."

Second, part of the windfall also originated from the of debt due by Mozambique to the African Development Fund and the World Bank's IDA. Neither of these organisations have the resources to grant relief on their own but the relief was funded by the HIPC Trust Fund.

The third factor, as stated by Hanlon is that "the unexpectedly generous deal is also a reaction to public pressure from the Mozambican and British governments, the Mozambique Debt Group, and the Jubilee 2000. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

When Debt Write-Off Is Not Relief
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.