Gun Lobbies and Gun Control: Senate Voting Patterns on the Brady Bill and the Assault Weapons Ban

By Kahane, Leo H. | Atlantic Economic Journal, December 1999 | Go to article overview

Gun Lobbies and Gun Control: Senate Voting Patterns on the Brady Bill and the Assault Weapons Ban


Kahane, Leo H., Atlantic Economic Journal


LEO H. KAHANE [*]

This paper uses an econometric model to analyze the political and economic factors affecting the Senate voting patterns on the 1993 Brady Bill and the assault weapons ban. Results of a logit estimation procedure support the hypothesis that the political activities and presence of the National Rifle Association (measured as relative campaign contributions and membership) had a significant impact on the voting patterns by Senators on both bills.

Introduction

During his campaign for reelection in the 1996 presidential race, President Bill Clinton pressed the need for campaign finance reform. The presumption was that private interest money was having an undue influence on the formation of public policy. The belief that special interest groups affect policy is, in fact, an old one. In "The Federalist No. 10," James Madison [1787] wrote, "Men of factious tempers, of local prejudices, or of sinister designs, may, by intrigue, by corruption, or by other means first obtain the suffrages, and then betray the interests, of the people." [1]

Contemporary academic researchers have explored the impact of lobby groups and special interest money on the formation of various policies [Kau and Rubin, 1978, 1979; Kalt and Zupan, 1984; Kahane, 1996]. This paper continues this line of research by analyzing the political and economic forces that shaped the Senate voting patterns on two public policies aimed at gun control: the Brady Bill and the assault weapons ban. Both of these bills, which were passed in 1993, were subject to great debate. The strongest opponent to their passage was the National Rifle Association (NRA) which has a reputation as a strong political lobby group in Washington, DC.

To test the notion that the NRA had significant influence on the voting pattern of senators on these two bills, this paper uses an econometric model to explain the voting behavior of legislators as a function of a variety of political-economic forces. The econometric results show that, controlling for other factors, the greater the political contributions by the NRA, the more likely a senator voted in the direction favoring the NRA on both votes.

The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. The second section provides background information for the Brady Bill and the assault weapons ban. The third section describes the econometric model used to explain the Senate voting patterns on the two bills. The fourth section contains the empirical results for the model, and the fifth section presents concluding remarks.

Background

The Brady Bill

A 1981 assassination attempt on President Ronald Reagan's life left the former White House press secretary, James S. Brady, permanently disabled. Following this tragedy, Brady's wife, Sarah, spearheaded an effort to enact legislation which became known as the Brady Bill. After seven years of heated debate, the Brady Bill was passed by the Senate (vote 394 HR-1025) on November 20, 1993 by a 63-36 vote. The bill implemented a mandatory five-business-day waiting period for purchasing handguns, allowing local law officials to conduct background checks of the buyer. [2] Much of the debate preceding the passage of the Brady Bill centered around the constitutionality of the proposed law and the effectiveness of gun control laws in reducing violent crimes and deaths attributed to gun usage. [3] The most active opponent to the bill was clearly the NRA. Indeed, at the September 30, 1993 hearing before the Subcommittee on Crime and Criminal Justice, the legislative counsel for the Institute of Legislative Action (ILA) of the NRA, Richard Gardiner, stated unequivocally that "the NRA remains adamantly opposed to any federally imposed waiting period prior to the sale of a handgun" [House of Representatives (HR), 1994].

The bill's strongest supporter was obviously Handgun Control, Inc. (HCI) whose chairperson, Sarah Brady, notes, "The Brady Bill has been considered and debated now for more than 6 years and 6 months. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Gun Lobbies and Gun Control: Senate Voting Patterns on the Brady Bill and the Assault Weapons Ban
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.