Free Trade: Why AFL-Cio, the Sierra Club and Congressman Gephardt Should like It

By Bhagwati, Jagdish | American Economist, Fall 1999 | Go to article overview

Free Trade: Why AFL-Cio, the Sierra Club and Congressman Gephardt Should like It


Bhagwati, Jagdish, American Economist


Jagdish Bhagwati [*]

Introduction

Last year, the President lost his bid for fast-track legislation, necessary for further trade liberalization within a framework of negotiations (as distinct from "going alone" and liberalizing unilaterally), for a variety of reasons.

Some had to do with himself. The credibility of his promises, relevant to the fast-track vote since he would have to "buy" support from skeptical Democrats, had been badly bruised by the fact that some of the promises he made during the perilously close NAFTA vote were forgotten but the betrayed Congressmen had not forgotten. [1]

Others included a legacy from an unfortunate, if inherited, flirtation with regional and as distinct from multilateral and MFN-based trade liberalization. While the President is widely credited by the pro-free-trade media and by unsophisticated economists with his success on NAFTA (a Preferential Trade Agreement par excellence and hence to be decried in itself by multilateral free traders such as myself), [2] it was in fact a Pyrrhic victory from the viewpoint of further trade liberalization. In particular, the NAFTA debate had crystallized, in a way that the multilateral (distinct from preferential) trade negotiations, such as the Uruguay Round rarely do, with the fears of workers and labor unions that freer trade with all but rich countries would imperil their real wages. Thus, the widespread perception that impoverished, illegal workers were streaming across from Mexico and driving down our wages led many to argue, quite correctly from an analytical viewpoint, that freer trade with Mexico would be an indirect way that this would happen. [In fact, in the impassioned national debate over the imposition of the first-ever national immigration legislation in 1905 by the English Parliament, the free traders were also free immigrationists, whereas the protectionists were also for immigration restrictions.] [3]

By contrast, the Uruguay Round raised few such worries: the diversity of issues, the multitude of countries, and the lack of political salience of the vastly greater poverty of countries other than Mexico, were guarantors of equanimity over the issue of trade with poor countries and its immiserizing effect on our own poor. [4] One serious legacy of NAFTA (whose advisability to a multilateralist such as myself is suspect anyway), therefore, was the plague it visited on future trade liberalization, by accentuating and politicising these fears (however unjustified, as I argue below) and aligning the unions and their congressional supporters against the further freeing of trade and against the passage of fast-track legislation to advance such efforts without serious qualifications and safeguards that many of us would regard as creating new obstacles to trade.

As it happens, the cause of freer trade is under threat today from precisely fears such as those of the unions over the living standards of the workers and those of environmentalists who are afraid that free trade will harm the environment: and John Sweeney of AFL-CIO and the Sierra Club, among many NGOs, happen to be afflicted by these fears and have turned them into an anti-free-trade agenda. Complementing these fear-induced opponents of Free trade are also the NGOs who seek to "piggyback" on trade institutions and trade-liberalization efforts to simply advance their social agendas, thus raising a very different set of threats to Free Trade.

But the protectionist viewpoint, never absent from the scene even in our classrooms ever since Adam Smith invented the case for Free Trade, is also to be reckoned with since it defines the broadly skeptical backdrop against which these fears are played out, especially by politicians such as Congressman Gephardt (though, I must say, he has lately begun to talk, perhaps for prudential reasons, less like a true-blooded protectionist who challenges the case for Free Trade and more like the fearful NGOs just cited). …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Free Trade: Why AFL-Cio, the Sierra Club and Congressman Gephardt Should like It
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.