Counsel, Hill Oppose Rebate of Clinton Fees

By Seper, Jerry; Price, Joyce Howard | The Washington Times (Washington, DC), December 19, 1999 | Go to article overview

Counsel, Hill Oppose Rebate of Clinton Fees


Seper, Jerry, Price, Joyce Howard, The Washington Times (Washington, DC)


****PROSECUTORS BLAME THE PRESIDENT'S DELAYS FOR COSTING BOTH SIDES MORE IN LEGAL EXPENSES.****

The independent counsel's office and members of Congress will challenge any effort by President Clinton to seek government reimbursement for more than $5 million in legal fees in the Whitewater and Monica Lewinsky investigations.

Lawyers and others close to independent counsel Robert W. Ray's office said last night that prosecutors - angry that much of the cost of the probes, including the president's still-unpaid legal bills, were the result of Mr. Clinton's own delaying tactics - already have examined the legal requirements for a reimbursement request.

Prosecutors are preparing formal responses to block or severely limit the effort.

"There is no doubt the request, if made, will be challenged, and challenged vigorously," said one lawyer familiar with the probes of Mr. Clinton and first lady Hillary Rodham Clinton.

Any request by the president for reimbursement of legal bills also is expected to be met with "bipartisan opposition" on Capitol Hill.

Rep. Lindsey Graham, South Carolina Republican and one of the House managers during the Senate impeachment trial of Mr. Clinton, said both Republicans and Democrats would oppose reimbursement because the White House lengthened the independent counsel's investigation with unwarranted and unnecessary delays.

"Most Americans, regardless of how they feel about the impeachment process, believe the president, through deception and perjury, extended the [independent counsel's] investigation and added greatly to its expense," Mr. Graham said.

He said it was doubtful many Democrats would line up in support of the government's assuming Mr. Clinton's multimillion-dollar legal tab, given that a federal court judge in Little Rock, Ark., fined the president $90,000 earlier this year for delaying the investigation by lying under oath.

"There's not an equitable argument that can be made" for having taxpayers pay the first couple's bills, Mr. Graham said.

Rep. Thomas M. Davis III, Virginia Republican, agreed. He said Mr. Clinton should not be reimbursed for legal debts in the Lewinsky investigation because of what he described as "a lot of self-inflicted wounds."

Mr. Davis said it would be improper for the government to pay a president's legal bills in situations where he has "hindered an investigation or shredded or withheld documents."

Mr. Clinton's contemplation of a reimbursement request was first reported yesterday by The Washington Post.

But the president's personal attorney, David Kendall, described such reports as "entirely premature" because the independent counsel's investigation is still under way.

"The president has a legal defense fund to raise money for legal expenses, and, hopefully, this will be sufficient," he said.

That defense fund has helped the president and first lady retire about half of a legal tab exceeding $10 million.

On other aspects of the Whitewater investigation, Mr. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Counsel, Hill Oppose Rebate of Clinton Fees
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.