Enough Stalling on NATO

By Bering-Jensen, Helle | The Washington Times (Washington, DC), March 5, 1998 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Enough Stalling on NATO

Bering-Jensen, Helle, The Washington Times (Washington, DC)

Let us go over this one more time, carefully: The United States won the Cold War. The Soviets lost. We were very polite about it at the time, but these remain the indisputable facts. Astonishingly, there are people here in Washington, in the U.S. Senate no less, who haven't quite absorbed this yet, seven years after the fall of the Soviet Union.

On Tuesday, the very same day the Senate Foreign Relations Committee voted on the ratification of the NATO membership of Poland, Hungary and the Czech Republic by a healthy 16-2 margin, a draft letter I have obtained was circulating in the Senate addressed to Majority Leader Trent Lott and Minority Leader Tom Daschle. It calls for a three-month postponement of the Senate floor vote scheduled by Mr. Lott for next week.

The ostensible reason for a delay until after June 1 is the lame excuse that the subject needs more study. "We are uncomfortable voting when so many of the purposes and assumptions of NATO enlargement remain either ambiguous or contradictory," so the letter goes. According to Senate sources, the letter, circulated out of Sen. Bob Smith's office, has won the signatures of Sens. Ted Stevens, Daniel Patrick Moynihan and John Chafee. Sen. Tom Harkin held a news conference announcing his support for a delay yesterday. As many as eight others may have committed to it, with another half dozen or so mulling it over.

Listed in the letter are such issues as cost estimates, NATO's role in Bosnia, the implications of the Baltic Charter (which the Clinton administration signed in January, committing itself to work for NATO membership for the Balts), political and economic integration in Europe, military capabilities and force levels.

Indeed, all of these are important considerations. So important in fact that they have already been studied exhaustively. The Foreign Relations Committee has held 12 hearings on these subjects, beginning last fall. Most recently, the committee heard from Secretary of State Madeleine Albright and Secretary of Defense William Cohen last week. More than 50 expert witnesses - for and against - have spoken to the senators. The cost of expanding NATO has been studied by the Pentagon, by the Rand Corporation, by the General Accounting Office, and many many more. If the good senators have not made up their minds by now, will they ever?

The real reason, of course, is to be found elsewhere. Tucked away among the many other concerns in the letter is this: "The ongoing crisis with Iraq has exposed potentially serious disagreements among current NATO partners and with Russia as to the severity of the crisis and the appropriate means to address it. These concerns need to be examined fully before the alliance is enlarged and its potential for internal friction increased.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Enough Stalling on NATO


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?