Maryland Weighs Bill for Boycott of Nigeria

By Woellert, Lorraine | The Washington Times (Washington, DC), March 20, 1998 | Go to article overview

Maryland Weighs Bill for Boycott of Nigeria


Woellert, Lorraine, The Washington Times (Washington, DC)


A Maryland bill to boycott Nigeria has thrust Annapolis into an international debate over states' rights in a new world of global trade treaties.

The Nigeria economic-sanctions bill has attracted the attention of players from the State Department to Shell Oil and could expose Maryland to a constitutional challenge from a powerful group of multinational corporations.

"The suggestion that the state of Maryland should be imposing foreign policy is somewhat of a stretch for us," said John Bowers, executive vice president of the Maryland Bankers Association. "This is very clearly delineated. It's a matter for the executive branch and the State Department."

To some people, that's a matter of opinion.

"They are way off base," said Sen. Barbara Hoffman, a co-sponsor of the Nigeria bill. "As a state, we can pass any law we want that affects how our state does business."

Under the bill, the Maryland government wouldn't buy goods or services from any company with direct or indirect interests in Nigeria. That expansive coverage has the potential to affect nearly every business in Maryland - or none at all, depending upon how "indirect interests" is interpreted.

"We have banks that may be doing business with commercial customers that may have relations with other commercial customers in Nigeria," Mr. Bowers said. "It's very hard the way the bill's defined."

With enough pressure, the theory goes, those companies might abandon their investments in Nigeria, which has been accused of human rights violations.

Selective-purchasing laws aren't new. More than 40 states have a "buy American" preference. Others favor local companies or give preference to minority- or woman-owned businesses. And the Maryland bill and others like it are patterned after a South Africa boycott many states adopted during that country's apartheid era.

Back then, however, states didn't have the World Trade Organization (WTO) to contend with. When the United States joined the international trade body earlier this decade, it agreed not to discriminate against foreign companies. State boycotts could violate that agreement.

Because the South African boycotts were so numerous, they are credited with helping to end apartheid. The effectiveness of boycotts of the 1990s remains to be seen, although they have had concrete results. Four major U.S. corporations, including Eastman Kodak and Motorola, have pulled out of Burma since Massachusetts passed a boycott of that Southeast Asian nation in 1996.

Under pressure from the State Department, Maryland lawmakers are sitting on the Nigeria bill for now. That move might quiet the debate in Annapolis, but it won't solve a nettlesome problem that is tearing at the fabric of domestic sovereignty and free speech in cities and states across the country, where selective-purchasing laws are proliferating. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Maryland Weighs Bill for Boycott of Nigeria
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.