Modeling Epidemiologic Typing Data and Likelihood Inference for Disease Spread

By Mellen, Beverly G. | Journal of the American Statistical Association, December 1999 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Modeling Epidemiologic Typing Data and Likelihood Inference for Disease Spread


Mellen, Beverly G., Journal of the American Statistical Association


A model for epidemiologic typing data is introduced, and likelihood ratio methods are developed for evaluating these data as evidence about disease spread. The observed data consist of microorganism subtypes from an index case of infectious disease, cases clustered with the index case, and a reference sample. The likelihood methods are evaluated via probabilities of observing epidemiologic subtypes that represent strong and sometimes misleading evidence favoring one hypothesis over another. A general bound is identified for the probability of observing strong evidence favoring a close epidemiologic relationship between the index and cluster cases vis-a-vis no relationship when in fact there is none. The advantages of this approach versus alternate approaches to measuring the strength of typing evidence are discussed.

KEY WORDS: Likelihood ratio; Misleading evidence; Molecular epidemiology; Profile likelihood; Reference sample; Schwarz criterion.

1. INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background

Outbreaks of infectious disease in human populations occur through the transmission of disease-causing microorganisms called pathogens. A major goal of outbreak investigations is to prevent further transmission of disease. The control of transmission is most effective when the pattern of transmission among the observed cases of disease is known. The disease transmission pattern is typically investigated with the aid of molecular methods (Maslow, Mulligan, and Arbeit 1993). These methods rely on the fact that for most infectious diseases, nearly all of the culprit organism's genetic characteristics remain constant during infectious cycles in hosts and during transmission. The molecular methods are thus used to identify subtypes of microorganisms among those isolated from clustered cases of disease that might or might not constitute an outbreak. The characteristics measured in subtyping procedures vary from method to method, but regardless of the method used, the aim is to delineate outbreak-related and -unrel ated (i.e., sporadic) cases of infectious disease. The results are then used together with results from other epidemiologic methods, such as the identification of personal contacts, to assess possible patterns of transmission.

To illustrate how molecular typing data might be used, consider the following scenario. Suppose that a worker in a health care facility becomes ill and is subsequently diagnosed with an infectious disease known to be spread through person-to-person contact. The possibility that he or she acquired the infection from a patient is considered. A review of records from recent patients in the facility identifies a greater than expected number of patients with the same infection. Included is a patient who had contact with the given health care worker. This worker is then the first identified case, called the index case, in this possible outbreak of infectious disease.

To initiate the subtyping process, blood samples are obtained for culturing microorganisms from the index case and all known concurrent cases of the particular infectious disease in the facility. Cultured microorganisms from possibly related previous cases are also retrieved when available from laboratory storage. These microorganisms are then subtyped. Suppose that the subtypes from the index case and his or her patient contact are the same. Furthermore, suppose that nearly all of the remaining microorganisms have this subtype as well. Then it is possible that cases with this particular subtype are related through transmission--that is, they are epidemiologically related--whereas cases with different subtypes are probably unrelated.

It is possible, however, that the observed subtype from the index and other cases is simply a widespread subtype for this pathogen. The subtyping procedure is thus carried out on a control group of patients who had the same infectious disease and were cared for in the same facility during the previous year, but whose infection is believed to be unrelated to the cases already studied and to one other.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Modeling Epidemiologic Typing Data and Likelihood Inference for Disease Spread
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?