Contesting Science's Anti-Religious Bias

By Witham, Larry | The Washington Times (Washington, DC), December 29, 1999 | Go to article overview

Contesting Science's Anti-Religious Bias


Witham, Larry, The Washington Times (Washington, DC)


The eight-year-old Discovery Institute is a Seattle think tank where research in transportation, military reform, economics and the environment often takes on the easygoing tenor of its Northwest hometown.

But it also sponsors a group of academics in science affectionately called "the wedge" - as in the steel spike for splitting hardwood.

The wedge is part of the institute's four-year-old Center for Renewal of Science and Culture (CRSC), a research, publishing and conference program that challenges what it calls an anti-religious bias in science and science education.

"I would say it's our No. 1 project," said Bruce Chapman, Discovery's president and founder.

It also has become a No. 1 target for those in science who say it is a slick new way to bootleg religion into the science laboratory or science classroom.

The wedge, which began with four people who wanted to question Darwinian materialism, now has expanded to 45 fellows with Discovery grants to do research and publishing. They nearly all are Ph.D.s in biology, math and science history or philosophy, and most have college or university posts.

The moniker for their movement is "intelligent design," a term coined in the late 1980s to say aspects of nature show design, and thus a purpose. Design, they say, is a valid scientific inquiry, even if it suggests a designer, such as God.

"This is a very rapid movement [in making] legitimate the issue in the secular world," Phillip Johnson, the Berkeley law professor who coined the term "wedge," told a Discovery conference this month on "Life After Materialism."

The intelligent-design movement has been opposed by some science academics, a National Academy of Sciences panel and the American Civil Liberties Union, which sued one high school science teacher for using an intelligent-design biology textbook, "Of Pandas and People."

This year, science philosopher Robert Pennock published "Tower of Babel" (MIT Press), which attacks the CRSC agenda and warns of the "size and renewed power" of what he calls the "new creationism."

Elliot Sober, a philosopher of science at the University of Wisconsin, is working on a university-level criticism of intelligent design's mathematical and biological arguments.

"What they want to talk about is a supernatural designer, namely God," Mr. Sober said in an interview. "They argue by claiming first that evolution cannot explain what we really observe."

In arguing for design in nature, "They are really saying what one observes is really very improbable," he said. "Although the ID movement is a new-wave thing in the creationist movement, in fact it has been around for a few hundred years, but they have done nothing to explain the facts of biology."

The intelligent-design partisans argued in "Life After Materialism" that materialism has been around since the Greek philosophers and still has not explained why nature appears so well-designed for life.

"The material scientists have had no need for the `God hypothesis,' " said Stephen Meyer, a philosophy of science professor at Whitworth College in Spokane, Wash., and director of the Discovery's CRSC.

"The big-bang theory," he said, for example, "has profoundly antimaterialist dimensions." The widely accepted theory says the universe began at a point and expanded. Others have noted that the finely tuned laws of the first seconds allowed carbon-based life to emerge.

Such findings in cosmology, biology and the human brain open the way to consider a "God hypothesis" (that God has designed key aspects of nature), said speakers at the conference.

They included people in biological science, political science, psychology and social science.

Mr. Johnson, the law professor, called the "godfather and guru" of the intelligent-design movement, got the debate going with his 1991 book, "Darwin on Trial," which challenged the atheistic assumptions of scientific practice. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Contesting Science's Anti-Religious Bias
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.